See, Earl? If anything, I gave Mitchell too much credit by saying there would be much attrition - he got blasted aside with relative ease, couldn't even give Mike the fight that Graham Earl did.
That's not to say Kevin isn't still more talented than Mike, but his skills need to be fine-tuned, put together better, applied to some next level of strategy and then solidly tested before he could be deemed ready for a fledged, strong, experienced lightweight with an intense, swarming workrate who throws a lot of hard punches.
You spout some of the most simple-minded non-logic on the forum -- in every thread, the last one I saw you in you were assessing Johnson's chances in a Haye matchup with classic lines like "best win is over a failed olympian" -- it's only the passive demeanour enables you to get away with it without being labelled a troll.
That's not to say Kevin isn't still more talented than Mike, but his skills need to be fine-tuned, put together better, applied to some next level of strategy and then solidly tested before he could be deemed ready for a fledged, strong, experienced lightweight with an intense, swarming workrate who throws a lot of hard punches.
You spout some of the most simple-minded non-logic on the forum -- in every thread, the last one I saw you in you were assessing Johnson's chances in a Haye matchup with classic lines like "best win is over a failed olympian" -- it's only the passive demeanour enables you to get away with it without being labelled a troll.
Comment