FAO: PED experts.

[TheManniePhresh]

After awhile, he'll begin ducking his own thread.

agreed or just spam more inaccurate hatred

[shogunn]

Indeed it would, but you'd be hard pressed to convince me that 12, 3 minute rounds is physically more taxing than cycling 2200 miles across a country.

yeah but theyre not exactly getting hit in the head are they.

Want proof which is more taxing, and dishes our more punishment?

Ali, Joe Louis, Dun Koo Kim

Name their counterparts in cycling

[Ryannn]

The Olympics includes boxing genius. The Tour De France is physically more taxing than boxing, etc, etc, etc.

And you believe that because you're ******ed.

http://ringtalk.com/exclusive-wada-h...ected-in-blood

WADA’s Director General David Howman responded as follows:
“WADA is not involved in the situation you are referring to, which falls under the jurisdiction of organizations that are not signatories to the World Anti-Doping Code (Code) – the document harmonizing global anti-doping rules.
“WADA strongly recommends the adoption of the Code by the organizations governing boxing worldwide. AIBA has adopted and implemented the Code, as more than 675 sports organizations around the world have done. The Code provides rigorous and transparent anti-doping procedures that sports and athletes who have nothing to hide should welcome.
“Among other provisions, the Code makes out-of-competition testing mandatory for signatories. Given that out-of-competition tests can be conducted anytime, anywhere, and without notice to athletes, they are considered the most effective means of detection and deterrence of doping and are an important step in strengthening athlete and public confidence in doping-free sport.
“A number of substances and methods banned by WADA’s List of Prohibited Substances and Methods, including hGH, are currently only detectable through blood testing.”

amateurs only fight twice a year?

and we can do this without the name calling.

i think it has been established that HGH, EPO, are detectable only in blood testing. my question is why it isn't enough for 3 blood tests and unlimited urine test to ensure one is not cheating. some of those who posted here said its basically useless to try to cheat with such tests.

[Hannibal Barca]

No where in those articles does it say the NFL or MLB has adopted USADA testing.

Next source, you did say NFL and MLB were working with USADA.

Don't lie, I said no such thing, and if I did, quote me.

No that it makes a difference. Random blood test are random blood test, wether they be implemented by the USADA, NSAC, or the NFL or MLB. But you can continue to grasp at straws if you wish.

[led]

And your opinion is meaningless, especially considering Olympic officials, Tour De France officials, the MLB and NFL front offices, and just about every other major sporting organization believe the opposite.

Furthermore, as I mentioned in the other thread you were spamming, you don't know a damn thing about PED's. You haven't the slightest clue about stacking, ****tails, or doping cycles. You have zero expertise in the effects of EPO, myosatin, the cream and clear, HGH, etc.

Next.

so u r tryin to tell us that there are many peds out there that needs to be detected.

how come when manny offered a 24-days cut-off, floyd offered a cut off date of 14 days. in 14 days that is too long a time for manny to take peds among numerous peds that we do not know (and perhaps u know them).

now, why the need to take those random blood testing when manny can still cheat in 14 days?

is floyd really wants to know that manny is clean?

i hope that this wouldnt become hate thread.

i just wanna know, who among you guys who ask pac to take the test if floyds offer of 14 days is sufficient to detect peds come fight night.

[Hannibal Barca]

yeah but theyre not exactly getting hit in the head are they.

Want proof which is more taxing, and dishes our more punishment?

Ali, Joe Louis, Dun Koo Kim

Name their counterparts in cycling

Are we talking about long term damage, or singular events in which blood test are supposedly supposed to have negative affects on an athletes performance. If were talking about which sport is more damaging long term? Than boxing hands down. If we're talking about which sport is more physically taxing, as in which is harder on the body in a singular event? It's Cycling.

[Hannibal Barca]

amateurs only fight twice a year?

and we can do this without the name calling.

i think it has been established that HGH, EPO, are detectable only in blood testing. my question is why it isn't enough for 3 blood tests and unlimited urine test to ensure one is not cheating. some of those who posted here said its basically useless to try to cheat with such tests.

Lonebum already answered your question. HGH can be cleared from the system within 24-48 hours. Hence the need for random based testing.

[Ryannn]

After awhile, he'll begin ducking his own thread.

why the **** would i duck this thread?

i haven't made any claims.

i haven't posted any information about PED's here myself. others have pointed out why its unnecessary to go through such tests.

any argument you have for the full blown OST i can deal with...

[shogunn]

Are we talking about long term damage, or singular events in which blood test are supposedly supposed to have negative affects on an athletes performance. If were talking about which sport is more damaging long term? Than boxing hands down. If we're talking about which sport is more physically taxing, as in which is harder on the body in a singular event? It's Cycling.

im talking in general. You may burn more calories cycling, but you wont get a concussion or a broken eye socket would you. Theres a reason you need a cut man in the corner in between rounds in boxing, its physically more taxing on the body.

but now were breaking in tangents.

If cycling was more physically taxing, then you would see the same long term affects as boxing, but there simply isnt.

[Hannibal Barca]

im talking in general. You may burn more calories cycling, but you wont get a concussion or a broken eye socket would you. Theres a reason you need a cut man in the corner in between rounds in boxing, its physically more taxing on the body.

but now were breaking in tangents.

If cycling was more physically taxing, then you would see the same long term affects as boxing, but there simply isnt.

Okay, you're entitled to your opinion. Though a guarantee you'd have a much easier time boxing for 36 minutes as opposed to cycling for 2200 miles.