demanding a proper drug test for major fights like these is not sabotaging anything. it's just there to make sure the fight is clean. don't you want Boxing to be elevated to the same level as football (european), tour de france, olympics... etc? the only people who denies the benefit of the ramdom test are the ones who don't give a **** about clean sport. or the guilty ones.
So are you not gonna watch boxing that does not have a USADA style testing because the fighter could not be clean?
So are you not gonna watch boxing that does not have a USADA style testing because the fighter could not be clean?
boycotting boxing matches is not the way to go if we are to expect boxing to keep it's act together, especially in the area of PEDs. remember that boxing is a poor man's sport, they need our support, well exceptions are 'Money' May and the famous fighters like Pac, etc, few of them are rich but generally this is where those who has got nothing to lose thrives. Boxing authorities should implement proper rules to protect these people. We as the consumers can help a lot by not only watching their fights but demanding that they come to the ring clean!
no wonder Boxing is very slow in these area cuz people like you would rather watch a deathmatch than a proper sport.
boycotting boxing matches is not the way to go if we are to expect boxing to keep it's act together, especially in the area of PEDs. remember that boxing is a poor man's sport, they need our support, well exceptions are 'Money' May and the famous fighters like Pac, etc, few of them are rich but generally this is where those who has got nothing to lose thrives. Boxing authorities should implement proper rules to protect these people. We as the consumers can help a lot by not only watching their fights but demanding that they come to the ring clean!
no wonder Boxing is very slow in these area cuz people like you would rather watch a deathmatch than a proper sport.
Let say Floyd will give way and fight Pac without the USADA testing, are you not gonna watch it in the sense that PAC could be dirty and the fight could be a deathmatch?
There you go, Boxing authorities (NOT FLOYD to his opponents) should implement proper rules.
And what is so special with Pac that he is the first one Floyd demanded for a USADA testing?
Pac beat SHOT HOYA and HATTON that were Floyds leftovers.
Pac beat Cotto (not on his prime anymore) that was HAMMERED by plaster man Marga.
Pac is struggling twice with Marquez while Floyd beat Marquez impressivelly.
Floyd beat Shane easily, the same Shane that Roach think is too good for Pac.
So, based on the facts above, why still need the USADA testing?
Changes in testing standards in any sport could easily come from someone somewhere as long is reasonalbe, humane, etc, this time it came from Floyd. What's so wrong if the changes came from him? Before something can be considered a standard it has to somehow replace an outmoded form of process and i think it's high time that Boxing consider their decade-old testing method.
"So, based on the facts above, why still need the USADA testing?". i don't know how you
managed to connect those premises, Pac beat shot hoya... to... Roach thnk is too good for Pac. and besides i've already answered that question from my previous comments
Let say Floyd will give way and fight Pac without the USADA testing, are you not gonna watch it in the sense that PAC could be dirty and the fight could be a deathmatch?
haha, the answer to your question is exactly my comments that you posed your question to.
Changes in testing standards in any sport could easily come from someone somewhere as long is reasonalbe, humane, etc, this time it came from Floyd. What's so wrong if the changes came from him? Before something can be considered a standard it has to somehow replace an outmoded form of process and i think it's high time that Boxing consider their decade-old testing method.
If changes could not be done witht he Floyd- Pac fight, why not do it with other Floyds fight after PAC, just to make the fight happens?
Do you really want to see the fight? or you just want to know whether Pac is on PEDS or not. Can't we deal the the 2 issues separatelly (they fight first and grill PAC on the PED issue latter) just to make the fight happens?
demanding a proper drug test for major fights like these is not sabotaging anything. it's just there to make sure the fight is clean. don't you want Boxing to be elevated to the same level as football (european), tour de france, olympics... etc? the only people who denies the benefit of the ramdom test are the ones who don't give a **** about clean sport. or the guilty ones.
Dood, why don't you just quit this foolishness? Pacquiao ain't the only boxer in the sport. How come you're not screaming for OST in the upcoming fights?
To tell you the truth I didn't enjoy last Saturday's fight between Mayweather/Mosley. I thought their performances were weak. Possibly because of the OST.
Dood, why don't you just quit this foolishness? Pacquiao ain't the only boxer in the sport. How come you're not screaming for OST in the upcoming fights?
To tell you the truth I didn't enjoy last Saturday's fight between Mayweather/Mosley. I thought their performances were weak. Possibly because of the OST.
You people are annoying.
not as annoying as you.
seriously, don't let other people's point of view that don't agree with your's get to you, kinda childish.
Comment