Floyd Sr is a nuthugger, not an expert.

[Blue Heffner]

yes

I wouldn't use the word "nuthugging" but he's definately BIASED.

That's his son, his family, his blood. They stick together. hahahaha.

[S.G.]

that guy sure loves his son.....WHAT A ****!

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

i can understand why floyd jr had to fire him in the first place. this guy is ****in ******ed. besides i was never a believer in that argument "if mosley beat X fighter and my guy floyd beat mosley, then he can beat X fighter by default." Thats just ******ed. By that argument Frazier should have beat Foreman because Frazier beat Ali, and Ali beat Foreman. Foreman destroys Frazier in 2 rounds. Or its like saying Mike Tyson should have been able to beat Buster Douglas, because Douglas beat Berbick....and Tyson destroyed Berbick in 2 rounds also. But Douglas beat Tyson in one of the greatest upsets ever. Or more recently...its like saying pac can EASILY beat floyd because pac destroyed Oscar and Hatton while floyd only won by split decision and 10 KO. ******ed arguments man. I can agree on one thing though, i don't think pac has ever faced anyone with a good crisp speedy jab. And floyd isn't going to just stop using it all of the sudden like cotto.

Yeah, a guy who shared a ring with Leonard is no kind of expert - we should be listening more to guys like you instead.



I think what he meant by the Mosley-Margarito remark was less a triangle theory and more a case of 'what could Mosley do to Margarito that Floyd couldn't?'

Short of backing Margarito up near the end and knocking him out, I agree with Sr. - Floyd would've boxed the **** out of Tony.

[NChristo]

OMG he is so biased !! I mean it's not like they're family or anything.