Comments Thread For: Malignaggi: Without The Tests, Pacquiao Beats Mayweather

[jrosales13]

All I know is that Manny Pacquiao should just agree to the 14 day
cut off and get in the ring.

Well I can definitely agree with that.

[ShoulderRoll]

So a jab followed by a left cross is considered setting up punches? That's nothing but a basic 1-2!

[jrosales13]

Honestly Jrose, me and you both need to be quiet because we aren't students of the game since we think that and don't see what they see. Pac is nothing more than a brawler. There I said it, am I a student of the game?

You must realize that only Floyd fans know about the sport. If you like Pac and think somehow beat Pac means you not a student of the game and just watch boxing when he beat Oscar. It is common sense OSIRIS.

[jrosales13]

So a jab followed by a left cross is considered setting up punches? That's nothing but a basic 1-2!

So are you saying he didn't set up the left hand with the jab?

Where do you guys come from?

[Khalid X]

Does a a single instance or two really reflect enough for one to say, "see, he does set up his punches, he did it a time or two in 50+ fights"?

I agree, he maybe biased and his word isn't gospel, but why would he be biased, and what makes your opinion any more valid than his? And fact is, he knows the sport better than either of us, and he does't have a dog in this fight.

Honestly, If I see something clear as day, such as watching pac set up punches against cotto and hatton, I could care less if a guy is a professional or not. His status doesn't change what I can see clearly with my own eyes.

Not to flame but if he told you the sky was purple, would you believe him just becuase he is a boxer? I mean seriously, you can tell he is just talking **** and shouldn't be taken seriously.

[jrosales13]

Honestly, If I see something clear as day, such as watching pac set up punches against cotto and hatton, I could care less if a guy is a professional or not. His status doesn't change what I can see clearly with my own eyes.

Not to flame but if he told you the sky was purple, would you believe him just becuase he is a boxer? I mean seriously, you can tell he is just talking **** and shouldn't be taken seriously.

Is Goosen take not more credible then damn near everybody on here. Is Joe Goosen not a student of the game? Do people forget how much he compliments Pac skills?

I guess some posters on here know more than Goosen.

[Hannibal Barca]

Honestly you just have an opinion of Pac and I'll leave it at that. I just don't get if he is "just a volumn puncher" etc..why do you want to see him fight Floyd. According to you guys, who like to discredit fighters, Floyd should blow him out the water making a fight between them pointless.

True, but I personally don't believe I allow my opinion(s) of Pac to fuel biased or cloud what I see in the ring.

Why do I want to see him fight Floyd? Because regardless of how I feel about either fighter, a Pac-Mayweather fight is the best thing that could happen for the sport of the moment. It's THE matchup everyone wants to see, and it'll inject so much needed life into the sport. As someone who loves the sport, I understand why this fight needs to happen. On top of that, I'd love to see Mayweather put on a masterful performance against the medias darling. It'd be nice.

[-Antonio-]

Paulie is ust a good talker. He's going to get beat up by Khan.

[Soda_Popinski]

lol 8 rounds! ? Bsed on what? Pac can only go 12 because hes on drugs?? lmao

What unfounded bull**** by Paulie. He is so sure but has no good reason to think Pac is on anything.

no more unfounded than those saying Shane gassed out after two rounds...which is BS...because everyone knows Paulie is spot on by saying Floyd simply neutralized him...

[Khalid X]

So a jab followed by a left cross is considered setting up punches? That's nothing but a basic 1-2!

he also sets up punches with feints, puts combos together to get certain shots in etc.

I mean what would constitute setting up punching in your your book?