Mayweather 41-0

[etlux]

How about Mosley? You know, the guy who got dodged by Pacquiao? I especially love the excuses on him.

The funny thing is that everyone acts asthough Floyd is the only dodger.. while Pacquiao's basically the same. His management is fully aware of when to pick a fight against who.

**** Manny's people even admit to it. At least Floyd has the sense to cover it up.

Roach says flat out who he has dodged and why (like in Mosley's case where Roach flat out admitted Mosley was too good)

and further, Roach flat out admits when a fighter is shot and that's why they fight him like in the case of DLH and Cotto when Roach said he knew they were ripe for the pickens because they were shot or had lost all punch resistance (same with Hatton), etc.

[illmaticfighter]

can people name some atg fighters of this era that had losses not fighters that haven't fought in twenty years or more.

[etlux]

Dodged? He took on Miguel Cotto instead, either option had Pacquiao chose would be a good one. But let me tell you, Pacquiao beats that Mosley in the fight and even KO's him. Mosley looked too old after round two, and he just let it lose for one round. He empited the tank to soon.

he took Miguel yet drained him just like he did DLH who needed to be rehydrated via IV

[Sick/]

hattons punch resistance had gone...lol paulie with 5 KO's was supposed to be beat hatton? fail...lazcano stunned him bad

it was a good win for hatton. ricky has been stunned before lazcano and mayweather.


You fail

[Harold Lederman]

he took Miguel yet drained him just like he did DLH who needed to be rehydrated via IV

You forget, that was Oscar's fault. He PICKED ON Pacquaio and to make it look "fair" He said let's do it at 147. Pacquiao at the time had no say or command in contract details. He was just a 135 pounder coming up to fight for a nice check so he could have been just another win and money in the pocket for DLH. but we all saw what happened.

[Artistic]

Dodged? He took on Miguel Cotto instead, either option had Pacquiao chose would be a good one. But let me tell you, Pacquiao beats that Mosley in the fight and even KO's him. Mosley looked too old after round two, and he just let it lose for one round. He empited the tank to soon.

Exactly, dodged. Mosley wen't to Pac-camp twice but Roach would have none of it. Instead, they choose to fight a shot Cotto for a paperbelt.

[Versatility]

it was a good win for hatton. ricky has been stunned before lazcano and mayweather.


You fail

hatton was the favourite to win that fight...paulie had 5 ko's...hattons punch resistance had totally gone after mayweathers check hook and the entire beating....thats why paulie with 5 ko's was a good fight to take, hatton was ruined after floyd gave him his first loss, both mentally and physically. lazcano wasn't feather fisted and hurt hatton several times..but he wasnt active enough to beat him, he was gettin outworked every round

you fail again...

[trk]

Notice most of these fighters fought Pacquiao at their normal fighting weight? Didn't have to come up for a ciricus fight.

Oscar Larios came up 2 weight classes to fight Pacquiao. Oscar de la Hoya was at a wieght he hadn't fought at in 8 years. Cotto was at a catch weight. Erik Morales was having trouble making 130, his previous fight (the loss to Zahir Rahim) and all his fights after his losses to Pacquiao coming at higher weight classes. Hatton and Clottey were at their "normal" weights but both were having some difficulty staying at those weights and had a few fights at higher weights. Barrera and Marquez were really the only big name fighters who fought Pacquiao at their best.

[Artistic]

**** Manny's people even admit to it. At least Floyd has the sense to cover it up.

Roach says flat out who he has dodged and why (like in Mosley's case where Roach flat out admitted Mosley was too good)

and further, Roach flat out admits when a fighter is shot and that's why they fight him like in the case of DLH and Cotto when Roach said he knew they were ripe for the pickens because they were shot or had lost all punch resistance (same with Hatton), etc.

Yep, hopefully the vid will beat some sense into the *******s.

[Harold Lederman]

Exactly, dodged. Mosley wen't to Pac-camp twice but Roach would have none of it. Instead, they choose to fight a shot Cotto for a paperbelt.

Had they fought Mosley and KO'ed himand not fought Cotto then you would be saying the total opposite.

You'd be saying "He went after a old, inactive fighter in Mosley who's past it and KOed him, while we know Cotto's still young, was champion and would have exposed Pacquiao" So Like i said, had he fought either two, it was fine, regardless of what excuses people would be making about dodging. Cotto was clearly the bigger name at the time.