if all that were true and pac has no chance, then why does floyd insist on OST? I mean pac has no chance right?
In the off chance that Pacquiao does land something and puts Floyd to sleep, at least you wouldn't have to hear about him bitching about Pacquiao being on steroids.
He takes the tests, he KO's Mayweather, it silences any doubt who is the best.
In the off chance that Pacquiao does land something and puts Floyd to sleep, at least you wouldn't have to hear about him bitching about Pacquiao being on steroids.
He takes the tests, he KO's Mayweather, it silences any doubt who is the best.
but I thought floyd was 1000x better than pac? pac is such a crude boxer that surely floyd's speed and skill will neutralize pac's crude offense right? so why the OST?
i know that you'll have fans of fighters and then there are extreme nuthuggers that blindly praise there favorite fighter and think they can walk on water. You'll have that with any big name fighter.
I'll admit that im a pac man fan through and through and i really do think that manny has a good chance to beat floyd. Even though floyd will have the better chance to beat manny than the other way around. Floyd is just a tought customer.
My question for floyd fans is this... Do you all honestly believe... with no bias that manny has no tools or no shot to beat mayweather?
i just think its crazy that some floyd fans ACTUALLY believe that manny has zero chance and will quote/unquote "destroy manny"
i believe manny has a decent chance. like you said i'd definitely put my money on mayweather though. i could definitely see manny's workrate as a possible problem for mayweather though. but he's so adaptable i just can't see him not overcoming it.
why do we even need a test? floyd is 100x better than pac right?
nope floyd isn't 100x times better than pac. he's a little better. so why not take the tests to ENSURE we have an even playing field? michelle kwan could do it lol.
but I thought floyd was 1000x better than pac? pac is such a crude boxer that surely floyd's speed and skill will neutralize pac's crude offense right? so why the OST?
We can play this game all night! you can say why I can say why not. But experts all agree better testing is better for the sport. You can tell yourself whatever you want.
but I thought floyd was 1000x better than pac? pac is such a crude boxer that surely floyd's speed and skill will neutralize pac's crude offense right? so why the OST?
He is better IMO, but this is Boxing and crazier stuff has and continues to happen.
nope floyd isn't 100x times better than pac. he's a little better. so why not take the tests to ENSURE we have an even playing field? michelle kwan could do it lol.
well, that's what *****s are trying to say. they are saying that floyd is so much better than pac... about 100x better. so if floyd is so much better then why does floyd need to use OST as a crutch and confidene builder?
We can play this game all night! you can say why I can say why not. But experts all agree better testing is better for the sport. You can tell yourself whatever you want.
I got no problem with OST... but if floyd is 100x better than pac then he shouldn't need that confidence booster and psychological crutch.
Tweet
Comment