Tweet
I didn't read it..but is it Ronnie?
-
-
here go the excuses he to old first he was toughest know he the oldest the critics cant let floyd enjoy no wins huh who ever wrote this should kick rock and then walk on a highway backwardsComment
-
Wow........I'm not even gonna insult or go on a rant. This is just.........Comment
-
-
First of all, the writer is a Pac **** rider for sure! Every article he writes he does so as if he's actually a member of Pac's camp. Second, The only difference in the recent resume's of Pac and Mayweather are Cotto, Clottey and Mosely. They both fought Marquez,Hatton and De La Hoya. Pac fans will argue that other than Marquez Pac was more impressive. That is not totally true. Pac squeaked by Marquez and fought De La Hoya at a drained 147. Mayweather fought him at 154 which was to DLH's advantage. People forget that boxing is often about styles. Has ANYONE heard of a fighter that has told Mayweather they would NOT take the blood test to fight him other than Pac? Williams, Berto,Cintron practically EVERYONE will take it for a shot at Mayweather. Pac is the only one I've heard that says no yet, that is the fighter that Mayweather wants. Far too many are blind by their loyalty for Pac to see that he either do not want the fight or is hiding something. Why not take the test? If every other major fighter is willing to do so because they know they are clean why not him? He's putting himself on an island.Comment
-
When did boxing become Collage Football?
I have to agree with the article becasue in boxing you have to beat someone to take their place in the rankings otherwise the rankings are just another popularity contest that has zero meaning.Comment
-
Thank you Ronnie for such a refreshing article. Tired of reading Lyle and his pro-Mayweather comments.
Viva Nathanielsz!!! Keep them coming Ronnie.Comment
-
He's claiming American bias when its arguable Pacquiao should have even been listed as the #1 WW in the first place.
Wasn't Shane #1 at the time he fought Cotto
Comment
Comment