Molsey (circa 2000) would have beaten Floyd.

[Ben_London]

You have to give Floyd credit for what he did to Shane. Theres a difference in fighting Marg and fighting Floyd. Shane found that out.

Floyds speed, defense, countering, feints and evn his power rendered Shane useless.

This isnt Mayorga, or Margarito. He fought Floyd.

He deserves credit, no doubt. But Mosley in those 16 months lost a lot, clearly.

[KILLA RIGHT]

Hell no! No matter what shane shows up, he was never able to deal with real boxers

[Cash Cow]

Fight would have been closer.

I'll give you that.

Ether way its a bad style match-up for Mosley.

I still favor Floyd.

yeah what he said

[Cash Cow]

He deserves credit, no doubt. But Mosley in those 16 months lost a lot, clearly.

lmao..come on man...fighting Floyd & fighting Margarito is 2 different things. No mattwer when they fought, Floyd will win because he is smarter, better defensively and more accurate

[Ben_London]

Hell no! No matter what shane shows up, he was never able to deal with real boxers

Watch the rematches with Forest and Wright.

[Piper the Great]

I have no clue wtf happen to my boy in the ring saturday

[Pullcounter]

Just saying, compare his legs then to now, it's not the same human being.

maybe.... but for damn sure it would've been more competitive

[illmaticfighter]

Just saying, compare his legs then to now, it's not the same human being.

so your saying the only way shane mosley could beat floyd is if he was 10 years younger and floyd is 33?

[Doctor_Tenma]

Watch the rematches with Forest and Wright.

In the rematch against Forrest, all he did was clinch. Same thing the 1st time around, except clinch way more.

[Ben_London]

so your saying the only way shane mosley could beat floyd is if he was 10 years younger and floyd is 33?

No, I'm saying if he had his legs like in 2000 then he would have won, not the legs which he had the other night which even an 80 year old grandpa could out run.