Average KO ratios of the top light-welterweights last 5 opponents

[BetterCallSaul]

KO ratios mean **** all to be honest.

If you take in account each of those guys last five opponents, Khan will not be at the top.

Khan - Dmitriy Salita, Andriy Kotelnik, Marco Antonio Barrera, Oisin ***an, Breidis Prescott.

Ortiz - Hector Alatorre, Antonio Diaz, Marcos Rene Maidana, Mike Arnaoutis, Jeffrey Resto.

Bradley - Lamont Peterson, Nate Campbell, Kendall Holt, Edner Cherry, Junior Witter.

Maidana - Victor Manuel Cayo, William Gonzalez, Victor Ortiz, Andriy Kotelnik, Silverio Ortiz.

Alexander - Juan Urango, Junior Witter, Jesus Rodriguez, Christopher Fernandez, Sun, Haeng Lee.

Khan's is the worst there imo

Men lie, women lie...

[amonb]

Khan ducked Maidana

Maidana ducked Bradley

Bradley ducked Alexander

Ducklings!!!

The 140 division looks like this -

I Like This!!!!

[23|1|26|1|1]

Men lie, women lie...

Numbers don't !!

Haha I love this thread. If I had any green I would have given you it.

[Pugilistic™]

Men lie, women lie...

So Khan's last 5 opponents have a better KO ratio than the likes of Bradley, Alexander,etc.

BUT that still doesn't change the fact that those other fighters have fought the better competition.

Out of Khan's 5 fights only 1 win is worth mentioning and thats the Kotelnik win.

The rest suck. Ko ratios mean **** all. I find it funny that you have gone to this length to give Khan credit.

[Ryn0]

Prescott has a 78% KO ratio, Bradley has a 42% KO ratio.

I would find it hard to justify Prescott being a harder fight than Bradley.

[Pugilistic™]

Prescott has a 78% KO ratio, Bradley has a 42% KO ratio.

I would find it hard to justify Prescott being a harder fight than Bradley.

Thank you.......

[23|1|26|1|1]

Prescott has a 78% KO ratio, Bradley has a 42% KO ratio.

I would find it hard to justify Prescott being a harder fight than Bradley.

Ok, so you should also agree that a Malignaggi fight is a harder fight then Maidana.

[Pugilistic™]

Ok, so you should also agree that a Malignaggi fight is a harder fight then Maidana.

Hell no, not for Khan anyway.

Paulie is a good boxer but is hittable and has no power to keep you off of him.

Maidana has a big punch, applys constant pressure and is durable.

Stylistically Maidana is a much tougher fight for Khan.

[jaskieee]

Khan - 53.95

Ortiz - 50.83

Bradley - 50.56

Maidana - 44.34

Alexander - 40.46


Looks like Khan isn't the only boxer avoiding big punchers in the light-welterweight division. The funny thing is, Khan and Ortiz are coming off KO losses and have still managed to fight better punchers than the other top boxers at 140.

I like threads that involve a little research, good substance =]

[BetterCallSaul]

So Khan's last 5 opponents have a better KO ratio than the likes of Bradley, Alexander,etc.

BUT that still doesn't change the fact that those other fighters have fought the better competition.

Out of Khan's 5 fights only 1 win is worth mentioning and thats the Kotelnik win.

The rest suck. Ko ratios mean **** all. I find it funny that you have gone to this length to give Khan credit.

I'm not talking about the quality of opposition. I'm merely stating that Khan has faced better punchers on average in his last 5 fights than the rest of the lww division. People always make a point that Khan avoids punchers. Well the stats tell a different story.