good for mayweather...bad for boxing.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The_Italian
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 1879
    • 87
    • 22
    • 8,406

    #1

    good for mayweather...bad for boxing.

    my first thoughts are that mayweather had a great fight. sugar shocked me in the first two rounds...in the beginning it looked like sugar might have mayweather's number (especially once he hurt him with that right hand). beyond that mayweather adjusted nicely and put on a truly dominating performance...so much that after the 10th round i turned it off as it was getting hard to see sugar (whose a future HOF anyway you look at it) lose like that.

    the ppv in general was bad for boxing (my opinion).

    it lacked names and competitiveness.

    there was just one good undercard fight but the rest easily could have appeared for free on FNF.

    i will admit i streamed it instead of ordering and now im glad i did. not worth $60 in my opinion.

    hope floyd v. pacman happens its the next logical fight.
Working...
TOP