Larry Merchant is the most biased son of a B*TCH in Boxing!!!

[C.Y.]

of course *******s would be oblivious to this.. merchant has always been a hater, he's a ****in loser with 1 foot in the grave.. he was probably drunk as usual.. showtime has better commentators

[Kagami Taiga]

haha, half the people do exactly the same thing with fighters, either its Mayweather, Pacquiao or even the Klitschkos.. a lot of us downplay fighters no matter what they do or accomplish and now Merchant is a SOB for doing what we do every day?

thing is we aint boxing commentators that arent supposed to be biased.

[Rick Grimes]

*****'s get butthurt when someone doesn't kneel and bow to Mayweather like they do.

Pac fans any different? They gang up like little bitches giving red k out when anyone says anything they don't like about Pacquiao.

[Shabba Rank$]

*****'s get butthurt when someone doesn't kneel and bow to Mayweather like they do.

You are obviously blind in the fact that we are just stating that Merchant didn't give ANY credit to Mayweather what so ever. Oh the *******s on this forum.

[Main Source]

It disgusted me the way he was trying to downplay Mayweathers every move...


He's a hater...


That's for the record...

This old hag takes 5 minutes to get one sentence out...

Yup, his time is over. They should let him go. In fact, they should switch the whole HBO team.

Try and watch the SkySport broadcasts. They never discredit a great fighter, e.g. Mayweather.

[Main Source]

haha, half the people do exactly the same thing with fighters, either its Mayweather, Pacquiao or even the Klitschkos.. a lot of us downplay fighters no matter what they do or accomplish and now Merchant is a SOB for doing what we do every day?

The big ****ing obvious difference is that they are journalists - their main goal is to be as objective as possible. Larry is just being plain bias and a hater.

[ColWallace]

The big ****ing obvious difference is that they are journalists - their main goal is to be as objective as possible. Larry is just being plain bias and a hater.

Er, they are not journalists. Not one of them. Larry is an ex-journalist, now he is a boxing analyst. Analysis is part and parcel of having an opinion and one opinion may differ to another opinion, but it doesn't mean someone 'hates' or is biased. I've never heard Larry say something that wasn't part of a common thread of established thought or fact, and thought "you lousy old black-hating bastard". He is a great, old-school commentator. He is not there to hype fighters. He pisses against big trees and is unafraid to ask confronting questions, and sometimes the truth hurts.

[Mr. Philadel]

I didn't watch the HBO version plus the spot I was in was so loud I wouldn't have heard the old hater go off ....Floyd did EVERYTHING right and there was NOTHING to complain about the show he put on last night.....dude fought a BRILLIANT fight and deserves some props!!

[ColWallace]

I didn't watch the HBO version plus the spot I was in was so loud I wouldn't have heard the old hater go off ....Floyd did EVERYTHING right and there was NOTHING to complain about the show he put on last night.....dude fought a BRILLIANT fight and deserves some props!!

The 'old hater' expressed his admiration in no uncertain terms at the end of the post-fight interview. "Congratulations on another brilliant performance" or words to that effect.

[abdiel2k3]

this is true
it he wasnt even watchin the fight
he had stuff to say
and happens what happens he was gonna say it
floyd runs
floyd has no power
floyds weak
when hes clearly proven him wrong in the moment but he was dead set and sayin that stuff
hopen it would come true