Only a convincing win will do for mayweather

**Clyde Barrow** · 05-01-2010, 06:57 AM

To hell with the casual fans. I want to see PBF press harder, but it's unlikely he does so. The guys he demolished aggressively weren't fast enough to threaten him, so he could get away with it. Not so with Shane, whose speed is not that much inferior to Floyd's. I'd love to see Shane rush him and force a replay of the PBF-Chavez fight though. That was counterpunching at it's best and a helluva fight.

**El Fenomeno** · 05-01-2010, 07:00 AM

Triangle theories don't work in boxing... so this is a pointless thread

**mrgreenfingers** · 05-01-2010, 08:14 AM

Originally posted by lfc19titles

I am a neutral, Pacman vs Money Mayweather, I want the best man to win.

For me there is little difference between Cotto and Mosley, in some days Mosley would win and some Cotto. Pacman, I would say dominated 10 out of the 12 rounds he fought against Cotto.

Mayweather now is fighting mosley, only domination will do, I am not asking for a ko but a total outclass in his way which is to outbox and not get hit.

At the moment I favour pacman to knock out floyd, why? you can only judge boxers on who they face and how they win. Cotto was an elite welter who pacman destroyed, Mayweather has not faced an elite Welter.

If Mayweather struggles against Mosley, You will lots of threads saying how Pacman would ko Mayweather and rightly so....

If mayweather dominated in the same fashion pacman did, then you will get 100000000 threads asking one question

Pacquiao vs Mayweather? Who R U Picking? (sorry tried to do it but that title is still ******ed...)

How about...

Pound for Pound?

Mayweather needs to impress and needs to impress to get back the casual fans who have just seen pacman literally beat the living hell hole out of his recent opponants. Hell even I am starting to become a *******...Only mayweather can save me by taking me to neutral again...

--------------------------------
sure
--------------------------------

**And Still** · 05-01-2010, 08:16 AM

Originally posted by lfc19titles

I am a neutral, Pacman vs Money Mayweather, I want the best man to win.

For me there is little difference between Cotto and Mosley, in some days Mosley would win and some Cotto. Pacman, I would say dominated 10 out of the 12 rounds he fought against Cotto.

Mayweather now is fighting mosley, only domination will do, I am not asking for a ko but a total outclass in his way which is to outbox and not get hit.
.

You are already a Pacrat if you think the same version of Cotto fought Mosley and Pac

**joesaiditstrue** · 05-01-2010, 08:24 AM

Pac vs Mayweather, Pacman has about 3 rounds to KO Floyd before he figures Pac out. Mayweather is most vulnerable at the beginning of his fights. You can see this in his Judah fight, and the Hatton fight. These early rounds are where Floyd is trying to ADAPT to his opponent. If Pacman can't manage to KO Floyd in this very crucial point in the fight, Money Mayweather will slowly dismantle Pacman over the next 8-9 rounds and cruise to an easy victory

just my opinion.

the same will go for this fight, Mosley will look at his best in the first few rounds, but if he doesn't completely overwhelm Floyd's defense by the 3rd, maybe 4th round, Mosley doesn't have a chance of winning this fight

I have Mayweather beating both of these guys by decision, a KO chance is more likely against Pacman but I'd guess UD.

Originally posted by And Still

You are already a Pacrat if you think the same version of Cotto fought Mosley and Pac

100% agree, I had never seen Cotto more tentative and cautious in a fight, than I had when he fought Clottey and Pacquiao.

**mrgreenfingers** · 05-01-2010, 08:25 AM

Originally posted by And Still

You are already a Pacrat if you think the same version of Cotto fought Mosley and Pac

excatly and that as of now mosley and cotto are the same sort of challenge, roach picked cotto over mosley for a reason

**Ryn0** · 05-01-2010, 08:39 AM

Mosley is not the same as Cotto...

Only a convincing win will do for mayweather