IS potshotting (a 38 year old man) = domination?

[Spacey1991]

clear/convincingly enough............isnt domination..............and age is a factor and inactiveness too............and you know it..........

Sure, if you say so.

Clearly you are misunderstood, I said if he does it effectively enough to show that he clearly won convincingly then to me that is domination, you asked my opinion, I gave it to you. If Floyd does it effective enough to beat Shane convincingly, then that shows that Shane couldn't do enough to be the dominant one in the fight, hence Floyd would have dominated, whether or not you like that style is irrelevant.

Its funny cause you **** on everything Floyd does, if he took a crap you would too. If he wasn't fighting Shane you would be crying and complaining, so don't give me any of that ****, just be happy that a big fight is happening.

Your just saying it so if Floyd wins, you can just say "well Shane is 38 years old, hes been off for a while, Floyd was supposed to win this means nothing!" and if Shane wins it will be "ahahaha, Floyd lost to a 38 year old man who hasn't had a fight in a while, Floyd has proven to be a bum", your just trying to make ready made excuses to **** on Floyd, win or lose... and you know it.

[Reloaded]

such low standard............for a self proclaimed GOAT.........wouldnt you say????

Could have went lower and ducked Shane like Pac did .

[STRUGG]

In a straight up 12 round fight with no KD's or deductions

7-5 for the winner is a close win
8-4 for the winner is a competitive win
9-3 or more for the winner is domination

The style in which the guy fights pertains to entertainment value, but has nothing to do with whether or not he deserves credit for the victory. If PBF potshots all night and that's good enough for him to win 9 rounds, boring or not, that means he dominated Shane. Period.

NO just no if 9-3 against a 38 year old is domination......what do you call the gatti and chico performance then????

[STRUGG]

Sure, if you say so.

Clearly you are misunderstood, I said if he does it effectively enough to show that he clearly won convincingly then to me that is domination, you asked my opinion, I gave it to you. If Floyd does it effective enough to beat Shane convincingly, then that shows that Shane couldn't do enough to be the dominant one in the fight, hence Floyd would have dominated.

Its funny cause you **** on everything Floyd does, if he took a crap you would too. If he wasn't fighting Shane you would be crying and complaining, so don't give me any of that ****, just be happy that a big fight is happening.

Your just saying it so if Floyd wins, you can just say "well Shane is 38 years old, hes been off for a while, Floyd was supposed to win this means nothing!" and if Shane wins it will be "ahahaha, Floyd lost to a 38 year old man who hasn't had a fight in a while, Floyd has proven to be a bum", your just trying to make ready made excuses to **** on Floyd, win or lose... and you know it.

you are clearly on your "off day".....as a floyd fan.......lol.....z bit overlydefensive.............and *****like.............

[STRUGG]

Could have went lower and ducked Shane like Pac did .

go find a pac hate thread to bump......lol.........GTFO off mine

[Clyde Barrow]

NO just no if 9-3 against a 38 year old is domination......what do you call the gatti and chico performance then????

That was annihilation.

[Junito-Rulez]

is shane not 38..............is he not been inactive..............if floyd wins 9 out of 3 by potshotting an old ATG........its a 4/10 at best.....how can you say i will discredit floyd no matter what???..........when id surely give him his props if he "DOMINATES" an old ATG...........

LOL, c'mon u're harsh on him. A win over Mosley is still a win over Mosley. If you can't fight the number 1 at WW, fight the number 2. It's what a real P4P champ is supposed to do.

I'm sure u wouldn't chose a berto or a cotto fight over shane mosley fight.
Shane Mosley is the best opponent avaialable for Floyd. P-Will is suspect to me, pretty overrated, good but overrated.

[Spacey1991]

you are clearly on your "off day".....as a floyd fan.......lol.....z bit overlydefensive.............and *****like.............

If you say so, I am not even gonna bother arguing with this post.

haha if this is what you mean by "potshotting", then I'd have to say yes!

http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...rm=potshotting

1. potshot 6 up, 21 down
The difficult art of jizzing in somebody's face when the lights are out.

Extra points are awarded if the result is still there when they wake up.

It is called a potshot because darkness causes inaccuracy in most cases
*Wakes up*
"Who the **** has potshotted me?!"

Where the **** did that come from?

[STRUGG]

LOL, c'mon u're harsh on him. A win over Mosley is still a win over Mosley. If you can't fight the number 1 at WW, fight the number 2. It's what a real P4P champ is supposed to do.

I'm sure u wouldn't chose a berto or a cotto fight over shane mosley fight.
Shane Mosley is the best opponent avaialable for Floyd. P-Will is suspect to me, pretty overrated, good but overrated.

its a win no doubt.......it aint a domination though..............if he potshots.......is it a crime to have great expectations from.................so called "great" fighters??............

[STRUGG]

That was annihilation.

clutching straws.................9-3 is a convincing win...............i wouldnt even say its a good win......if he potshots.......................