At the time of stoppage a couple of the judges had Tyson up, around 57-55. If it wasn't for the two point deduction that would have made it 59-55.
Now I admit that McBride is a bag o'crap and didn't show any real boxing skill, but that just illustrated further how much Tyson had deteriorated. I have to ask... how could two judges say that Tyson was winning that fight?
Now I admit that McBride is a bag o'crap and didn't show any real boxing skill, but that just illustrated further how much Tyson had deteriorated. I have to ask... how could two judges say that Tyson was winning that fight?
Comment