I think Floyd is going to lose a close hard fight...

[dajabgameisill]

I think he's saying the judges will give floyd the fight if its close.

i doubt it ... do you think floyd can win a decision not being active...dont u think GBP would make more money if mosley fought pac man ?

[gqjohnb]

i doubt it ... do you think floyd can win a decision not being active...dont u think GBP would make more money if mosley fought pac man ?

No I don't

[SmoothMon]

No I don't

I was thinking mosley gets robbed if its a spilt. But i got Mosley losing the close fight, due to frustration of straight punches as he does in all big fights. Shanes a beast, i just dont think he can pull of the highly un likely. Notice i didnt say impossible.

[cortdawg25]

This theory that you got to lose to be great doesn't make any logical sense. floyd beats Mosley in mosley's prime.

Mosley has always been a Mexican with fast hands and we all know Floyd loves mexico!

[dajabgameisill]

This theory that you got to lose to be great doesn't make any logical sense. floyd beats Mosley in mosley's prime.

Mosley has always been a Mexican with fast hands and we all know Floyd loves mexico!

it doesnt really make logical sense ...but it makes sense... you dont know how much you really have until you lose ... shane didnt need winky ...and shane didnt need forest... he lost to both of them and bounced back ... defeated the people who defeated them .... mayweather has never dug deep ...never really been a fight ... all mosley fights are risky ...

[Chuckguy]

He might win the rematch...



He will then be respected by the media and everybody else ...


Hes is not going to win this fight though ...


I am willing to bet on that, all good boxers lose ... but the question is can you come back from the loss...

I like your honesty man
I strongly believe that Shane is gonna catch Floyd and hard

[cortdawg25]

it doesnt really make logical sense ...but it makes sense... You dont know how much you really have until you lose ... Shane didnt need winky ...and shane didnt need forest... He lost to both of them and bounced back ... Defeated the people who defeated them .... Mayweather has never dug deep ...never really been a fight ... All mosley fights are risky ...

to me the only sense is logical....with that said, i disagree with you that u must lose to see what u are made of.

In my experience, being at the top and staying there was much harder than coming back after i lost.

You have to have immense mental fortitude to be able to be on top for 10 yrs. For 10 yrs, he has been getting everyones best and he still standing better than ever.

Losing doesn't make winners, only losers. And if you have real heart and medal then will never allow yourself to lose!

[Pacquiao'd]

people cant seem to make up their mind. first it was "floyd wont fight shane, then when floyd signs to fight, it turns to, "shane is over the hill, old, shot, going to be blood drained."

now is, shane is going to beat floyd. what are the excuses going to be when shane lose?

[ChiTown2Diego]

people cant seem to make up their mind. first it was "floyd wont fight shane, then when floyd signs to fight, it turns to, "shane is over the hill, old, shot, going to be blood drained."

now is, shane is going to beat floyd. what are the excuses going to be when shane lose?

Shane loses this fight imo, but I also think Floyd only took this fight because he was forced to one up Pac after negotiations broke down and Pac/Clottey was signed

[Pacquiao'd]

Shane loses this fight imo, but I also think Floyd only took this fight because he was forced to one up Pac after negotiations broke down and Pac/Clottey was signed

welll, this is how you arent making any sense. floyd tried to fight shane twice and shane was the one ducking and dodging the fight so floyd wasnt forced to do anything.

if anything, it was strategic why floyd chose not to freeze mosley out any longer b/c it would put pacs back against the wall...and it worked