L. Merchant: "Today's breed of boxing fans put more emphasis on UNDEFEATED records"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • heat27
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 5059
    • 174
    • 193
    • 20,131

    #41
    “In the old days, if a fighter was unbeaten the response from fans was ‘Who has he fought?’ and ‘Is he being protected?’” Merchant said. “Fighters were not judged by their records. They were judged on who they fought and how they fought them.
    real ****ing talk
    that how it should be now

    Comment

    • Gutz
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 4039
      • 142
      • 99
      • 10,693

      #42
      Larry is the man!!

      Comment

      • Motofan
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 9098
        • 604
        • 1,912
        • 28,443

        #43
        Listen to Larry.

        Comment

        • -MAKAVELLI-
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 50080
          • 3,580
          • 2,792
          • 169,000

          #44
          HBO is a big part of why 'today's' breed puts more emphasis on unbeaten records

          Comment

          • Piper the Great
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 2325
            • 32
            • 73
            • 9,128

            #45
            I just hate when someone lose now he overrated, washed up, past prime, shot

            Comment

            • V.WEBB
              CBVM
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 14327
              • 621
              • 174
              • 21,453

              #46
              Originally posted by AmericanYeti
              What undefeated has a better resume than Floyd today? He was using Floyd as the best example of the undefeated and he's right. Oscar and Shane both have better resumes. They also both have 5+ losses.
              Originally posted by johncods
              Nope I said all. You know any undefeated who today that has a decent resume?? Now you asked if all?? we'll floyd's the best example I can find because he has the BEST undefeated resume.
              Well say Floyd then. When you said ALL, I thought of a the YOUNG fighters that were undefeated and some of them have fought some good competition even at this early stage of their respective careers. Alexander comes to mind, Bradley comes to mind. etc.

              Originally posted by johncods
              Thank You. SMFH at some of these dudes.
              SMH at you, be clear when you post. You stated..."all undefeated fighters..".

              Comment

              • Vasyl’s dad
                He said no rematch
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 23510
                • 1,120
                • 1,945
                • 50,072

                #47
                **** does he know,

                "boxing is a business".


                All that matters is how much money they make.

                Comment

                • 1nonlymre
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 627
                  • 79
                  • 3
                  • 9,826

                  #48
                  Originally posted by The Impaler
                  So what's Larry Merchant's point? That most boxers lose their undefeated records? There's a shocking a revelation.
                  No, that's not the point. Geez. The obvious point of this article is to thorw out there the idea that the great "0" is a symbol of superiority nowadays when it wasn't necessarily so in the past. If anything, an undefeated record prompted more questions than answers.

                  Was it really that difficult to figure out?

                  Comment

                  • Calilloyd
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 4373
                    • 124
                    • 292
                    • 10,868

                    #49
                    Originally posted by AmericanYeti
                    What undefeated has a better resume than Floyd today? He was using Floyd as the best example of the undefeated and he's right. Oscar and Shane both have better resumes. They also both have 5+ losses.






                    In Oscar's case one of those losses was to Mayweather. And Oscar had everything in his favor from the weight, glove size, and the date. No he does not have a better resume. I'll wait until Saturday to see if Shane can make that claim.

                    Comment

                    • Calilloyd
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 4373
                      • 124
                      • 292
                      • 10,868

                      #50
                      Originally posted by johncods
                      Thank You. SMFH at some of these dudes.




                      Keep shaking it because Oscar doesn't have a better resume than Mayweather.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP