Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao: Roach Has a Drug Testing Solution

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brick wall
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 6480
    • 259
    • 35
    • 24,574

    #471
    Originally posted by IMDAZED
    I don't know what "selective" OST is. Can you define that?
    lol nice try...it's something like when you consider your opinion as full of sense and automatically consider others as nonsense.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #472
      Originally posted by brick wall
      lol nice try...it's something like when you consider your opinion as full of sense and automatically consider others as nonsense.
      Is that your response? I knew you couldn't answer.

      Comment

      • brick wall
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 6480
        • 259
        • 35
        • 24,574

        #473
        Originally posted by Loccy
        I'm not impressed, Roach.
        shut up ****** boy

        Comment

        • switchsouthpaw
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2007
          • 2669
          • 73
          • 6
          • 8,766

          #474
          Originally posted by IMDAZED
          Then no, we're not talking about negotiation. I know you can't really answer what I wrote without putting yourself in a bad place but I'll repeat myself:

          The issue is that there shouldn't be a cutoff in the first place.

          Why did Pacquiao backtrack on what he agreed to?
          Number one I know I wouldn't end up in a bad place, because with each of my responses I'm thinking 10 steps ahead. I just told you that I "myself" stand 100% behind the testing procedures that the Nevada commission has in place and see no need for additional testing, that is my position from day one and I stand by that, no additional testing period.

          But since both of these parties have used this issue as a sticking point with respect to negotiations, then I can offer my opinion on it. Floyd asked for 14 days, Manny has countered with 17, should be a done deal. I don't know why Pac back tracked nor do I care. I care about both of them getting their asses in the ring. If you're asking me whether or not I believe Pac is guilty of anything, then the answer is no.
          Last edited by switchsouthpaw; 04-29-2010, 12:18 PM.

          Comment

          • brick wall
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 6480
            • 259
            • 35
            • 24,574

            #475
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            Is that your response? I knew you couldn't answer.
            lol yeah i think i can't answer. the word selective is too complicated i guess

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #476
              Originally posted by switchsouthpaw
              Number one I know I wouldn't end up in a bad place, because with each of my responses I'm thinking 10 steps ahead. I just told you that I "myself" stand 100% behind the testing procedures that the Nevada commission has in place and see no need for additional testing, that is my position from day one and I stand by that, no additional testing period.

              But since both of these parties have used this issue as a sticking point with respect to negotiations, then I can offer my opinion on it. Floyd asked for 14 days, Manny has countered with 17, should be a done deal. I don't know why Pac back tracked nor do I care. I care about both of them getting their asses in the ring. If you're asking me whether or not I believe Pac is guilty of anything, then the answer is no.
              Again, you are creating your own starting point. Let's try this again.

              Both parties agreed to OST. What was the issue thereafter?

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #477
                Originally posted by brick wall
                lol yeah i think i can't answer. the word selective is too complicated i guess
                yeah, must be.

                Comment

                • Jcsuper
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 2685
                  • 200
                  • 381
                  • 9,253

                  #478
                  I think this fight will happen one day, tooooo much money involved not to happen. No way Bob Arum will let that go away and continues make fight against Top Rank bums, all he's doing this way is buying time. Also Floyds 4 or 5 fights deal with GBP will soon end and no way DLH and GBP will accept to loose that money

                  Comment

                  • Gratide
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 644
                    • 17
                    • 0
                    • 6,727

                    #479
                    What the hell is it with the test anyway , boxing has a comission and THEY set the rules not GAYWEATHER ! If I were Manny I'd just tell him to quit making up his own damn rules and STFU . If you want to fight split the monies even and come @147 and let the boxing comission worry about the rest. Manny probaly would like to beat the hell out of the loud mouth boy but there is a limit to the amt of bull you have to put up with .

                    Comment

                    • switchsouthpaw
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 2669
                      • 73
                      • 6
                      • 8,766

                      #480
                      Originally posted by IMDAZED
                      Again, you are creating your own starting point. Let's try this again.

                      Both parties agreed to OST. What was the issue thereafter?
                      You are missing a key component, yes both parties agreed on the "random" nature of the testing however, they disagree as far as the cutoff dates, one issue of "random" was and has been agreed upon and the other issue of a "cut-off" date was/has not, what exactly are you missing that this is a negotiation with more than one sticking point?

                      If I were Pac I wouldn't have agreed to anything more than what Nevada requires. You think Nvada should employ a personal conduct policy (similar to what the NFL employs), their is a reason I'm asking you that, if you don't tell me why and I'll explain to you how it relates to your position.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP