Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao: Roach Has a Drug Testing Solution

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • babyl-on
    Up and Comer
    • Nov 2009
    • 57
    • 5
    • 6
    • 6,103

    #191
    Originally posted by carts
    im sure this will be the next excuse for floyd..
    no. i'm sure it'll be the other way around. may will compromise with pac on testing IF pac accepts a 60-40 split. and it'll be hard to negotiate against that because may-mosley is a HUUUGGGGGEEE draw. thus may wins leverage. again this is assuming may wins.

    Comment

    • Russian Crushin
      atheist with a gun
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 33788
      • 1,471
      • 836
      • 46,625

      #192
      Originally posted by Bhopreign
      I didnt hear Floyd discredit his whole career, Ive heard him say about Shane, we dont know if he was using in other fights, if he said the same about Manny, I dont think such a statement is discrediting his whole career. Can you defend Manny with the email asking the fight to continue for the good of boxing in lieu of a positive test.
      Sure Floyd trashes and discredits everything Manny has done. Its like Margarito being caught once with Plaster and now everyone is saying he used it before against Cotto and other fighters putting a big question mark on his career.....but Manny isnt in that position, hes never been caught or even around it yet people are assuming the same thing

      Comment

      • Bhopreign
        Banned
        • Jun 2006
        • 11273
        • 419
        • 100
        • 12,036

        #193
        Originally posted by yevskiy426
        Sure Floyd trashes and discredits everything Manny has done. Its like Margarito being caught once with Plaster and now everyone is saying he used it before against Cotto and other fighters putting a big question mark on his career.....but Manny isnt in that position, hes never been caught or even around it yet people are assuming the same thing
        Ok since youre defending Manny, what would be his reason for not allowing random tests up till fight day/week?

        Comment

        • babyl-on
          Up and Comer
          • Nov 2009
          • 57
          • 5
          • 6
          • 6,103

          #194
          Originally posted by Bhopreign
          Its not leverage, its because Pac knows he's dirty, if it was leverage, when Floyd brought up testing, Manny would have said no to the whole thing, cutoff date or no cutoff date.
          yes. you fit in category a.) of my first post in this thread... like pg 10 or something. i'm speaking with a child that is rebeliously staying up past their bedtime on their dad's computer to post about a sport they like because "yeah, they fight good." don't respond to me if you have nothing relevant to say. re-read what you said, then what I said, then what you responded. now ask yourself if your response makes any sense in context. now stop posting because your act (who knows, maybe it's not) is only entertaining for so long. eventually real feedback and comments will be needed.

          Comment

          • Russian Crushin
            atheist with a gun
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 33788
            • 1,471
            • 836
            • 46,625

            #195
            Originally posted by Bhopreign
            Ok since youre defending Manny, what would be his reason for not allowing random tests up till fight day/week?
            Leverage...plus you dont boss around and disrespect a champ by saying hes on PEDs. He didnt just say take the test.....it came at the end of a long line of accusations and nasty insults by the Mayweather clan....i mean this E-side meth thing was ridicluos, he even stated manny wasnt on Roids, they were e side Meth

            Comment

            • Bhopreign
              Banned
              • Jun 2006
              • 11273
              • 419
              • 100
              • 12,036

              #196
              Originally posted by babyl-on
              yes. you fit in category a.) of my first post in this thread... like pg 10 or something. i'm speaking with a child that is rebeliously staying up past their bedtime on their dad's computer to post about a sport they like because "yeah, they fight good." don't respond to me if you have nothing relevant to say. re-read what you said, then what I said, then what you responded. now ask yourself if your response makes any sense in context. now stop posting because your act (who knows, maybe it's not) is only entertaining for so long. eventually real feedback and comments will be needed.
              Mr. 13 posts, you really dont exist to me.

              Comment

              • Bhopreign
                Banned
                • Jun 2006
                • 11273
                • 419
                • 100
                • 12,036

                #197
                Originally posted by yevskiy426
                Leverage...plus you dont boss around and disrespect a champ by saying hes on PEDs. He didnt just say take the test.....it came at the end of a long line of accusations and nasty insults by the Mayweather clan....i mean this E-side meth thing was ridicluos
                Again if it was leverage, Pac wouldnt even agree to a cutoff date. He would just go tell Floyd to screw himself with the whole thing, why cant you see that.

                Comment

                • babyl-on
                  Up and Comer
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 57
                  • 5
                  • 6
                  • 6,103

                  #198
                  Originally posted by Bhopreign
                  Mr. 13 posts, you really dont exist to me.
                  hahaha. yes. again. you sir are a child. really? you're going to base status on number of posts? wow.

                  Comment

                  • Shabba Rank$
                    ~Swift~
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 5994
                    • 336
                    • 319
                    • 13,526

                    #199
                    Why does Pac need a cutoff that late? He was offered a 14 day cutoff and still didn't accept? What's three days gonna do for you?

                    Comment

                    • Bhopreign
                      Banned
                      • Jun 2006
                      • 11273
                      • 419
                      • 100
                      • 12,036

                      #200
                      Originally posted by babyl-on
                      hahaha. yes. again. you sir are a child. really? you're going to base status on number of posts? wow.
                      What else would I base it on, I have no posts with you making any sense for reference.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP