Ronnie Nathanielsz, NSB is calling you out for your BIASED flip-flopping! [EXPOSED]
Collapse
-
Man, I know what you are saying, but Dan Rafael still talks about other fighters. He has biased ass views, and I don't really listen/read whenever Mayweather is involved (Mayweather is so polarizing that I tend to just watch him fight and forget about anything anyone has to say about him, all the spectrum from Ellerbe to Rafael -with the exception of Roger Mayweather who is extremely funny, albeit often not voluntarily). But you go to Dan Rafael Q&A, and you find stuff about say Pavlik-Martinez. The only reasons you will ever see RN mention Sergio Martinez are
1) He is mentioned as a Pac opponent
2) He says something about Pac
3) Pac says something about him.
4) He is caught ****ing Jinkee.Comment
-
most of the times, i dont like nathanielz articles too. one thing is its like that he licks pac's ass too much. imo, nathanielz just panders to the filipino people. he writes grandest things about pac and makes things always in favor of filipino fighters. he provides filipino people a morale boost that filipinos are known internationally in boxing world. yet, in the end, a nice fat checks in his pockets.Comment
-
Thread Starter you have my support. It is utterly disgusting when you see an article on the front page and from the first line's biased writing you know who wrote the article. Not to mention even when the article has NOTHING at all to do with Pac midway through, out of nowhere he some how gets mentioned and then the rest of the article is about Pac the fighter of the decade, Pac the greatest pound for pound fighter in the history humankind, Pac the 8th wonder of the world, Pac the King of Zamunda blah blah blah. I'm sure there are some unbiased Pac fans who feel the same way. Props to you TS.Comment
-
Comment
Comment