Why not Mosley-Mayweather for Ring Mag title?

[ColWallace]

As far as I know this is a non-title fight, but it should be for the Ring Magazine title in my opinion. Floyd is an undefeated ex welterweight Ring champ and Shane is their no.1 at 147lbs (Pacman is no.2). Their rules state:

"Championship vacancies can be filled by winning a box-off between The Ring's number-one and number-two contenders, or, in certain instances, a box-off between our number-one and number-three contenders."

[Ryn0]

Not checked the ring ratings recently?

Pacquiao is the number 1 WW.

[Silencers]

Pacquiao is number 1.

[Junito-Rulez]

Actually Pacquiao holds the belt. If they wanted it to be for the RING title, they should have stripped the title from Pacquiao who won it against Cotto.

[ColWallace]

swear I was just there and Manny was no.2, but I see I'm wrong. My eyes are obviously fading as fast as my brain.

[Walt Liquor]

pac is 1 and floyd hasn't fought a ranked weltereweight since 2006.

[Kilrain]

pac is 1 and floyd hasn't fought a ranked weltereweight since 2006.

Boom! Speakin the truth

[mrgreenfingers]

Actually Pacquiao holds the belt. If they wanted it to be for the RING title, they should have stripped the title from Pacquiao who won it against Cotto.

wrong, how could it have been read the rules at the top of the thread, cotto wasnt one or two in the division neither was pac, also pac being no.1 is a joke surely he would have to beat mosley who was no.1 to get the ring belt