Who is the GREATER Fighter as of date?

[Ryannn]

Up to now i havent read any argument on why Shane's career as of date is better than Erik Morales's career.

If Shane has the greater career then WHY? and HOW? All data goes to
Erik Morales.

Thank god at least the poll has reasoning

i hear ya. they just blurt out "its shane" without any argument behind it.

i guess it has something to do that shane is a lot more mainstream than erik (at least to american fans).

but yeah, its definitely el terrible.

[miron_lang]

i hear ya. they just blurt out "its shane" without any argument behind it.

i guess it has something to do that shane is a lot more mainstream than erik (at least to american fans).

but yeah, its definitely el terrible.

Mate, Are you the same Ryan from saddos?

[Ryannn]

Mate, Are you the same Ryan from saddos?

nah. i only post on bscene and esb.

ive actually been here a long time, but my original account got banned.

[FeFist]

Morales' best wins are Pacquiao and Barrera which is better than Shanes' Oscar and Margarito.

The Pacquiao Morales beat couldn't hold a candle to the De La Hoya Shane beat.

[Castor_Troy]

The Pacquiao Morales beat couldn't hold a candle to the De La Hoya Shane beat.

ok I wont dispute that. But how about the Barrera that Morales beat compared to Margarito? If you are objective enough you would agree that

Barrera >>>>>>> Marg

and how about the rest of their careers? Does that victory over t Dela Hoya clinch it for you?

[FeFist]

ok I wont dispute that. But how about the Barrera that Morales beat compared to Margarito? If you are objective enough you would agree that

Barrera >>>>>>> Marg

and how about the rest of their careers? Does that victory over t Dela Hoya clinch it for you?

I simply called you out on you implying the Pacquiao Morales beat was a better win that Mosley's win over De La Hoya. When people make some valid points they tend to carried away and spout nonsense.

[Castor_Troy]

I simply called you out on you implying the Pacquiao Morales beat was a better win that Mosley's win over De La Hoya. When people make some valid points they tend to carried away and spout nonsense.

And i agree to that point. Does that clinch it for you?


You think Shane has better legacy than Morales? Why and how ?

[poeticlsykuac]

Morales losses to Pacman were far and away past his prime, unfair to judge him based on those losses. Especially since he beat Pacman past his prime. I still have Morales taking the first 2 of the MAB trilogy(didn't even look like he tried in the third) so I really don't see to many negatives on Morales resume. Raheem was when he was past his prime and I still think he deserved the nod over Diaz(even past his prime).

If Morales would have been the boxer puncher we all know he could be he would have had a much longer career but he wouldn't have received the love he gets now.

[JOM'S]

I know Pac has improve a lot since his last loss to Erik, but their is in no way that Pacquio is chopped liver at that point in time, he was already three time world champion in three weight class with two of them lineal championship and he went 1-1-1 versus the tres Amigos ....

IMHO p4p speaking that version of pacquio could hold his own against the odlh that mosley beat ...

[poeticlsykuac]

I know Pac has improve a lot since his last loss to Erik, but their is in no way that Pacquio is chopped liver at that point in time, he was already three time world champion in three weight class with two of them lineal championship and he went 1-1-1 versus the tres Amigos ....

IMHO p4p speaking that version of pacquio could hold his own against the odlh that mosley beat ...

That DLH would have KO'd Pacman with no issue. DLH was very good, his left hook would have caused serious problems. His speed was very deceptive and he just had power in both hands. Pacman has a lot of problems with a well calibrated left hook, JMM. Straight rights also helped which DLH had a solid pop with. DLH at 130 would have ate pacman alive, no questions asked.