Who is The real fighter of the decade explain.....
Collapse
-
Comment
-
he was a american olympian who had boxing pedigree with his uncle & father & was brought up by top rank who has a reputation for guiding their fighters vs carefully matched opponents early in their career.
it doesnt matter whether he got gold, bronze, or silver, he had a better background, opportunity, support, training, nutrion etc. compared to a 16 year old kid who ran away from home living in abject poverty in a thirld world country in souteast asia.
there's no comparison.Comment
-
There's nothing in floyd resume that could even surpass hopkin's resume how much more against pac's resume.
*****s can cry all day but they can't change the fact that pacquiao is a fighter of the decade.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
and why insult a poster here in your thread saying he has no knowledge on whatsoever??? calling him a *******..Comment
-
threadstarter might not understand what it is a figher of the decade, maybe he thinks arturo gatti is because he likes his fighting style, lol, nyahahahahahaComment
-
The Pacman is a FOUR LENIAL DIVISION CHAMP as well as a champion of SEVEN DIFFERENT WEIGHT CLASSES.
Nobody else in the history of boxing is a four lineal champ.
Nobody else in the history of boxing is a seven division champ.
Manny is both.
So what if many of those he fought came off a loss. Does that automatically mean that they're all shot? Heck man, we might as well forget about rematches and ANY OTHER FIGHTER WHO LOST A FIGHT. That's cuz even if a person wins, its actually a loss since the guy he won over is not as good as he should be because he lost previously.
How do you know that the fighters the Pacman won over were not really that good? Did you ask them to hit you in the face on their prime and then hit you again right before they fought Manny? Did you feel that their punches were somehow NOT AS PAINFUL?Comment
Comment