Tweet
Froch camp claimed from the start of the competition that abrahams team gave their word that the fight would be in the uk
Abrahams team claim frochs camp is lying....while frochs camp is saying abrahams camp is lying....
so one is lying....I think its abrahams as froch claimed right from the first fight that they had an agreement to have the fight in the uk, if froch was lying why didnt the aa camp come out from when the super six first began to say it isnt true? of course I could be wrong but can you blame them?
Abraham vs taylor, in the fight taylor was not allowed to throw any body shots as the fans and aa team claimed low blows when they were not
Froch vs Dirrell, very controversial fight as we all know, froch was lucky to escape with a win
Ward vs Kessler, ward should have been dqd about 4 times over for throwing around 6 head buts and 4 elbows
Dirrell vs Abraham, perhaps the only clean fight so far in terms of the ref doing their job and not buckling under the pressure of home town fans. Abraham should have had two knockdowns but did not get them but I really think that was due to the ref being an idiot rather than home town reffing
Kessler vs Froch, again very close fight, def not a unanimous decision and the scorecard should not have been wider than 115-113, froch most likely landed more punches and we know he landed clear shots. fight could have easily been a draw or froch win. Most people agree in a neutral ground froch would have won
What does the above tell us?
are abrahams and frochs camp right to try and argue? is aa camp right to go back on their word if they have?
I say yes, its clear home town judges and referee are the deciding factor in almost every fight due to the fighters being so evenly matched.
Perhaps these fights should have all be done on a neutral ground....one question....how the fk did ward apparently get all of his fights in his home town?
Abrahams team claim frochs camp is lying....while frochs camp is saying abrahams camp is lying....
so one is lying....I think its abrahams as froch claimed right from the first fight that they had an agreement to have the fight in the uk, if froch was lying why didnt the aa camp come out from when the super six first began to say it isnt true? of course I could be wrong but can you blame them?
Abraham vs taylor, in the fight taylor was not allowed to throw any body shots as the fans and aa team claimed low blows when they were not
Froch vs Dirrell, very controversial fight as we all know, froch was lucky to escape with a win
Ward vs Kessler, ward should have been dqd about 4 times over for throwing around 6 head buts and 4 elbows
Dirrell vs Abraham, perhaps the only clean fight so far in terms of the ref doing their job and not buckling under the pressure of home town fans. Abraham should have had two knockdowns but did not get them but I really think that was due to the ref being an idiot rather than home town reffing
Kessler vs Froch, again very close fight, def not a unanimous decision and the scorecard should not have been wider than 115-113, froch most likely landed more punches and we know he landed clear shots. fight could have easily been a draw or froch win. Most people agree in a neutral ground froch would have won
What does the above tell us?
are abrahams and frochs camp right to try and argue? is aa camp right to go back on their word if they have?
I say yes, its clear home town judges and referee are the deciding factor in almost every fight due to the fighters being so evenly matched.
Perhaps these fights should have all be done on a neutral ground....one question....how the fk did ward apparently get all of his fights in his home town?
Comment