this guy speaks the truth..
Collapse
-
family member
is that slimshady lmao . dude you are so deluded its not ven funny , are u indeed carl froch or a family member lol . he lost fair and square deal with it , funny last time you posted about all those british and american pundits saying froch beat dirrell have kessler beating froch by 1 or 2 rounds so not only are u deluded but a major hypocrite too . -
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Froch won that fight no doubt in my mind.
In my eyes he could have been awarded the first 5 rounds with ease. Couple that with the 9th 10th and 11th rounds in which he has Kessler sprawling from heavy shots it's amazing how anyone can give it to Kessler by more than 1 round.
Notice how nobody is posting their Round by round if they thought Kessler won by 3-4 rounds? Lfmao.. it's because they dislike Froch and want to see him lose. That's why.
In my eyes Sauerland stole that belt. Absolutely stole it with corrupt judging. Froch was the established holder and Kessler took a serious amount of damage coupled with being outboxed for the majority of the fight.
Froch: Handing out beatings since 2010 even in 'deafeat'.Comment
-
lol
lol you and slimshady are the only two butthurt about froch losing on this forums haha get over it that fact froch even had trouble with a declining kessler nevermind got beat shows you how ****e he is . british media and pundits that had froch beatting dirrell all had kessler beating froch by 1 or 2 rounds so accept it instead of trying to convince yourself and others lolFroch won that fight no doubt in my mind.
In my eyes he could have been awarded the first 5 rounds with ease. Couple that with the 9th 10th and 11th rounds in which he has Kessler sprawling from heavy shots it's amazing how anyone can give it to Kessler by more than 1 round.
Notice how nobody is posting their Round by round if they thought Kessler won by 3-4 rounds? Lfmao.. it's because they dislike Froch and want to see him lose. That's why.
Froch: Handing out beatings since 2010 even in 'deafeat'.Comment
.
Comment