lol kelly pavlik gets outboxed by sergio martinez, so....

**MOTHER DUCKER** · 04-25-2010, 02:28 PM

Originally posted by skullduggery

Mikkel Kessler/ Carl Froch= NOT GREAT FUCKIN BOXERS!

Kelly Pavlik=Great ****ing boxer right???

No he ****ing doesn't and im a Pavlik fan as well, Froch/Kessler are bigger and stronger i would back Froch by KO over Pavlik in a short war and Kessler by wide UD..

**Clyde Barrow** · 04-25-2010, 02:30 PM

Burner? Is this your alt mate?

**skullduggery** · 04-25-2010, 02:31 PM

Originally posted by snootz86

Kelly Pavlik=Great ****ing boxer right???

No he ****ing doesn't and im a Pavlik fan as well, Froch/Kessler are bigger and stronger i would back Froch by KO over Pavlik in a short war and Kessler by wide UD..

lol i never said that pavlik was a great boxer... i said he lost to two great boxers, and ppl go and think hell lost to ppl who arent great boxers, which makes no sense....

**MOTHER DUCKER** · 04-25-2010, 02:34 PM

I can't remeber the thread you made but it was something like Pavlik demolishes Kessler/Froch. When infact Kessler is probably more sound technically then Pavlik is alot bigger also. Froch has a great chin/huge punch and again is a lot bigger and is proven at SMW unlike Pavlik..

Please tell me how Pavlik a guy who over 160 has been pretty awful is going to beat two proven guys at SMW?

Pavlik should stay down at 160 he gets beat at 168 by Dirrel/Ward/Froch/Kessler/Bute i think he can probably beat AA due to inactivity AA has at start of fights. I also believe barring a cut he could have beaten Martinez + he got a big money fight with Williams if he can beat Martinez.

**Wan Long Pong** · 04-25-2010, 02:35 PM

Why is this a separate thread from your existing discussion?

Froch and Kessler are often straight up, European-style fighters.......................... but then so is Moby.

**the niggest** · 04-25-2010, 02:35 PM

Originally posted by skullduggery

lol i never said that pavlik was a great boxer... i said he lost to two great boxers, and ppl go and think hell lost to ppl who arent great boxers, which makes no sense....

Pavlik would def put an ass whoopin on Froch...

But he would not beat Kessler. Kessler is the better boxer, he is faster, he has more techniqe and he punches just as hard as Pavlik. I def think it would be close whoever wins and Pavlik def has a chance at winning but what exactly makes you think Pavlik will have such an easy night with Kessler? You say stykes makes fights, both kessler and pavlik play into each others styles.

**Heru** · 04-25-2010, 02:40 PM

Yeah, it's not as cut and dry as people want to make it seem. Boxing fans are what have you done for me lately and they forget what a fighter can do.

As of right now I would favor Froch and Kessler, but I would not dismiss changing my pick to Pavlik.

**Sweet Jesus** · 04-25-2010, 02:43 PM

These are two fights I'd like to see when Kelly goes up to 168.

**BennyST** · 04-27-2010, 03:52 AM

Originally posted by skullduggery

FROCH and KESSLER automatically destroys him?? lmao kids these days
wtf ever happened to STYLES MAKE FIGHTS? does that just go out the window when a fighter loses?

bottom line is:
Sergio Martinez/ Bernard hopkins= Great ****in BOXERS
Mikkel Kessler/ Carl Froch= NOT GREAT FUCKIN BOXERS!

so plz- break this down... HOW IN HELL DOES FROCH "DESTROY" KELLY PAVLIK? kESSLER?

Kids these days? You're only in your teens.

lol kelly pavlik gets outboxed by sergio martinez, so....