Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Mosley a tougher fight for Floyd than Pac?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Doorag View Post
    What has Mosley done lately that suggest that he is better than Pacquaio in every department? He hasn't fought in over a year and in that time Pacquaio has beaten three quality fighters.

    Pacquaio is also close to his prime while Mosley is 38 years old.

    Mosley will have to prove me wrong on may 1. Until then I will remain sceptic on how much he really has left in him.
    Mosley is 38 years old but his biological age would be 25 because of the way he lives..he trains and eats right he's a machine.

    Suddenly mosley is old huh? What about de la hoya who is only 2 years younger than mosley..should we give pacquiao credit for beating a 37 year old weight drained de la hoya?

    Floyd served him hatton

    Margarito served him cotto

    Shane served margarito.

    Now whoever wins on may 1 is the true p4p king.

    Comment


    • #12
      I think Mosley is a tougher fight for Floyd. Win or lose I think he beats Manny. Its a toss-up with Shane. I'll give odds against Manny.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by DiLLiNGER View Post
        Mosley is 38 years old but his biological age would be 25 because of the way he lives..he trains and eats right he's a machine.
        So does Manny Pacquiao. Wonder what his biological age is.

        Originally posted by DiLLiNGER View Post
        Suddenly mosley is old huh? What about de la hoya who is only 2 years younger than mosley..should we give pacquiao credit for beating a 37 year old weight drained de la hoya?

        Floyd served him hatton

        Margarito served him cotto

        Shane served margarito.

        Now whoever wins on may 1 is the true p4p king.
        Both Mosley and DLH are old and out of prime, so what? I give Pac more cred for beating Cotto, Hatton and Clottey than than DLH, where as yourself don't give him credit for anything because of your obvious bias.

        Comment


        • #14
          not even close

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Doorag View Post
            So does Manny Pacquiao. Wonder what his biological age is.



            Both Mosley and DLH are old and out of prime, so what? I give Pac more cred for beating Cotto, Hatton and Clottey than than DLH, where as yourself don't give him credit for anything because of your obvious bias.
            Well roach said it himself that shane mosley was too dangerous for pacquiao didn't he??? And he also said that de la hoya couldn't "pull the trigger" anymore,maybe that was the reason the fight was made??..and that's coming from the guy who trains pacquiao.

            For cotto he can get some credit..but for hatton and clottey? Clottey didn't throw anything I know that's not pacquiaos fault but that fight was a fluke.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by DiLLiNGER View Post
              Well roach said it himself that shane mosley was too dangerous for pacquiao didn't he??? And he also said that de la hoya couldn't "pull the trigger" anymore,maybe that was the reason the fight was made??..and that's coming from the guy who trains pacquiao.

              For cotto he can get some credit..but for hatton and clottey? Clottey didn't throw anything I know that's not pacquiaos fault but that fight was a fluke.
              Did you ever think that maybe Pac got into Clottey's head and threw him off his game? Why doesn't Pac get credit for **** like this?

              Trash talking is not the only way to get into someone's head.

              And Roach says alot of ****. you can't quote him as the gospel. He said Floyd would be an easier fight than Cotto back in the day

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by DiLLiNGER View Post
                you don't know what you're talking about..shane is not a brawler he's a good boxer who is not scared to fight it out..hatton is a brawler..margarito is a brawler..i don't put mosley in the same category..and you saying that pacquiao has a good head movement made me laugh.

                Shane mosley has more to offer than pacquiao..one thing they got in common and that is putting the pressure on a fighter but besides that i rate mosley above pacquiao in every department.
                If Shane was to fight Pac, Id think Pac has the slight edge but that would be a great fight. Maybe one of the best fights in the last decade for sure. But Pac is more of a threat. He Is younger, faster, I think he has better power in both hands with more an arsonal of punches, he's a southpaw, and his foot work and work rate can't be matched by many right now. Pac has the edge over Mosley against Floyd without a doubt.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by PH|L View Post
                  Did you ever think that maybe Pac got into Clottey's head and threw him off his game? Why doesn't Pac get credit for **** like this?

                  Trash talking is not the only way to get into someone's head.

                  And Roach says alot of ****. you can't quote him as the gospel. He said Floyd would be an easier fight than Cotto back in the day
                  How so? By smiling at him? That wouldn't suprise me tho after all it's clottey!!

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by DiLLiNGER View Post
                    you don't know what you're talking about..shane is not a brawler he's a good boxer who is not scared to fight it out..hatton is a brawler..margarito is a brawler..i don't put mosley in the same category..and you saying that pacquiao has a good head movement made me laugh.

                    Shane mosley has more to offer than pacquiao..one thing they got in common and that is putting the pressure on a fighter but besides that i rate mosley above pacquiao in every department.
                    totally agree!!!!!! imho i think pac is not on the same level as pbf and shane

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by DiLLiNGER View Post
                      Well roach said it himself that shane mosley was too dangerous for pacquiao didn't he??? And he also said that de la hoya couldn't "pull the trigger" anymore,maybe that was the reason the fight was made??..and that's coming from the guy who trains pacquiao.
                      I have no idea if Roach said that and I really don't care. I'm basing my opinion on observations I make, and that is that Mosley hasn't fought for over a year and his closing in on his 40's! That's why I rank Manny above Mosley, previous merits. Don't care about 'he said, she said'.


                      Originally posted by DiLLiNGER View Post
                      For cotto he can get some credit..but for hatton and clottey? Clottey didn't throw anything I know that's not pacquiaos fault but that fight was a fluke.
                      Who else has beaten Clottey and Hatton like Pacquiao beat them? He shut Clottey out and knocked Hatton out in 2 rounds, no one has ever come close to that. In my eyes that is impressive.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP