NO belt on the line??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BattlingNelson
    Mod a Phukka
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 29881
    • 3,255
    • 3,200
    • 286,536

    #11
    Originally posted by ABOSWORTH
    At first I was kinda pissed that it wasn't going to be for the belt but now I think it's kind of funny. Floyd's a prick to the end. Think about it though. It's a total slap in the face for the sanctioning body.
    Indeed it is. I'm beginning to enjoy Floyd's antics. Although he's a prick.

    Comment

    • gingeralbino
      WAR MAGEE!!!
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 7999
      • 224
      • 388
      • 20,405

      #12
      Originally posted by !! 2Tough !!
      Would you agree that the casual fan (whom generates the most revenue) believes that a 'belt' means something..? To us boxing fans it means nothing. But doesnt not having a belt take the edge out of the fight to the casual fans?
      they will still see Shane walk out with the WBA belt, he's just not gonna be giving it to Floyd if he loses.

      Plus he'll be introduced as the WBA WW champion of the world at the start.

      By the end no-ones gonna give a **** if they see Floyd lift a belt over his head or not.

      Comment

      • Heru
        Quintessence
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 9492
        • 533
        • 353
        • 26,205

        #13
        There's already going to be 3 WBA titlist (there's already Nushenko as the "regular" and there's another fight that will be for the interim).

        The WBA has the most history, but has been a running joke for years.

        I hope they all die out and every boxer just goes after the Ring title.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP