Who do you think is best? Haye, Adamek or Arreola?

[o0P4PBOXING0o]

To me Haye is easily the best, Even though I really dislike him.

Adamek a close 2nd and Arreola 3rd. Arreola is basically a HBO hype job.

He can't even ****ing jab. He just runs at you and says "Let's Go"

[bojangles1987]

Haye.

Adamek is good, but he is a little over his head at heavyweight and we will see that at some point.

Arreola has heart, but the guy just isn't that good and does not have the work ethic he needs.

[Pirao]

I'm pretty sure Valuev was the #3 contender for The Ring-belt when he and David fought, which means he was ranked fourth.

He was definately a top HW, which is sad.

No, he wasn't. Chagaev, Chambers, Povetkin and of course Vitali, were all ranked above him, which means he was #5 by the RING and #6 overall, and of course he was only ranked that high because he "beat" Holyfield.

[W1LL]

Haye followed by Adamek. Arreloa is just rubbish.

Nail, hammer, head, hit.

[Shazam!]

Haye by KO in both fights.

[Bring It On]

No, he wasn't. Chagaev, Chambers, Povetkin and of course Vitali, were all ranked above him, which means he was #5 by the RING and #6 overall, and of course he was only ranked that high because he "beat" Holyfield.

Povetkin might have been ahead of him, but I doubt that Chambers was. Got any rankings from that time period?

[AndyShitHot]

1) Haye
2) Arreola
3) Adamek

[GeorgiaRED]

I voted for Arreola.

[iron mike tyson]

david haye is the most skilled most accomplished and probs has the best resume so david haye am afraid
followed by adamek and wtf has arreola done??

[Pirao]

Povetkin might have been ahead of him, but I doubt that Chambers was. Got any rankings from that time period?

Nope, do you? But I remember them. At that time Chambers had beaten Dimitrenko and Peter, both of whom were top 10 ranked by the RING at the time, and yes, he was ranked ahead of Valuev.