Why did Boxingscene include IBO into boxing champions titles.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Flawless*
    Banned
    • Mar 2010
    • 3547
    • 279
    • 36
    • 4,484

    #1

    Why did Boxingscene include IBO into boxing champions titles.

    Explore the current list of boxing champions across all weight classes. Find out who holds the titles in each division, updated regularly on BoxingScene.


    When was the IBO recognized as a worthy titles.

    I say, remove IBO and WBO
    Last edited by Flawless*; 04-19-2010, 01:15 AM.
  • SoldierWarrior
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 3804
    • 86
    • 113
    • 10,191

    #2
    Originally posted by Adam Carolla
    http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/view.php?pg=champions

    When did the IBO recognized as a worthy titles as well. I say, remove IBO and WBO
    Then Chad Dawson wouldn't be a champion if your removed it.

    Comment

    • jrosales13
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 32632
      • 739
      • 763
      • 40,023

      #3
      Because, it is becoming a major title. Just like the WBO did like a decade ago...

      But, to be fair to the IBO I like them more than the other major 4 titles. I like that they rank other champions. Something that they major 4 don't do.

      However, if we going to get rid of belts. Then all the commissions should follow JBC suit and only recognize the WBC and WBC. And, just say fuck IBF, WBO, and IBO.

      Comment

      • -Swizzy-
        The Wolf
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 8821
        • 431
        • 330
        • 661,075

        #4
        Originally posted by Adam Carolla
        http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/view.php?pg=champions

        When did the IBO recognized as a worthy titles as well. I say, remove IBO and WBO
        the IBO has the best rankings system of all the major titles. all other titles should be scrapped EXCEPT for IBO... and the ring of course.

        Comment

        • Flawless*
          Banned
          • Mar 2010
          • 3547
          • 279
          • 36
          • 4,484

          #5
          Originally posted by SoldierWarrior
          Then Chad Dawson wouldn't be a champion if your removed it.
          And? I don’t care. Too many titles already. Going to be near impossible to unity the division. The meaning of winning the world titles means nothing these days,

          Comment

          • jrosales13
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 32632
            • 739
            • 763
            • 40,023

            #6
            Originally posted by kswizzy99
            the IBO has the best rankings system of all the major titles. all other titles should be scrapped EXCEPT for IBO... and the ring of course.
            I agree, the IBO ranking system is better. I said keep the WBC and WBA. But, I like your idea better get rid of everything else and keep the IBO and the Ring.

            Comment

            • ulises_solis
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jan 2009
              • 478
              • 36
              • 9
              • 620

              #7
              ibo is becoming a good sanctioning body
              good move

              Comment

              • tesla_power
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2009
                • 2050
                • 66
                • 87
                • 8,744

                #8
                There was a time when they got most of the "true" ( I mean recognized ) champions right. I'm comparing to the 4 major belts. IMO, they are more reliable than the so-called major belts.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP