Duran Got Owned By All 3 Other Fab 4 Guys: Why's He Ranked High?

[etlux]

ok. maybe I'm starting to see the light then. Thank you all for the illumination. Duran is truly great. Anyone got links to some of his vids/fights?

[etlux]

ah the zab judah method.

[etlux]

Yeah right, Some of his competition was tough. Just because they didn't become big superstars doesn't mean they were "taxi drivers" He faced off some tough opposition like it or not. Stop trying to discredit JCC, Even going 100-0 is still a tough accomplishment.

He actually went 83-0 I think. He faced off against 4-5 undefeated fighters in his prime.

Study up on the facts kid before you make accusations

Wow out of 100 fighters he only fought 4 guys with undefeated records?

**** is sad bro..

[Scott9945]

i think he was like 73-0 if i remember rightly?

thats f'in why

No, Duran lost a decision to Esteban DeJesus in a non title fight. He later KO'd DeJesus twice in title fights.

[Pacquiaoo]

I understand he started at a lower weight class than the others, fought as low as 135 but in reality he started at 140 so I'll consider him a more natural 140lber.

Hearns started 147 not that big of a difference.

Leonard also started at 140 so they're even.

Hagler was the only one that stayed at 160 the whole damn time.

Not true. Duran started at 120.

Reigned the lightweight division for a long time. He beat Leonard in his prime. Went to distance with Hagler in a close fight. Only the much bigger Hearns owned him.

[Hagler★]

****ing ******s like this guy ruin the site for me. He beat Leonard, took Hagler the distance putting up a very good fight.

His loss to Leonard was designed for him to fail instant rematch he had to lose the weight he put on partying to celebrate his win but meh he lost and against Hearns he shouldn't have even been in the ring as he hadn't trained properly.

If you genuinely didn't know I apologise but if this is a WUM you're an ass

[STRUGG]

****ing ******s like this guy ruin the site for me. He beat Leonard, took Hagler the distance putting up a very good fight.

His loss to Leonard was designed for him to fail instant rematch he had to lose the weight he put on partying to celebrate his win but meh he lost and against Hearns he shouldn't have even been in the ring as he hadn't trained properly.

If you genuinely didn't know I apologise but if this is a WUM you're an ass

true that.............chances are hes a kid...........

[etlux]

****ing ******s like this guy ruin the site for me. He beat Leonard, took Hagler the distance putting up a very good fight.

His loss to Leonard was designed for him to fail instant rematch he had to lose the weight he put on partying to celebrate his win but meh he lost and against Hearns he shouldn't have even been in the ring as he hadn't trained properly.

If you genuinely didn't know I apologise but if this is a WUM you're an ass

wow you have an excuse prepared for every single loss of his. that's sad

[BrooklynBomber]

He did beat an undefeated Leonard, and he was damn close to beating Hagler. Hearns was like Brad Pitt to him though.

[Hagler★]

No excuses these are the facts I read 4 kings and hands of stone, I watched the fights, I read up. That was probably my fav period of boxing, so it is annoying to see people talk outta there ass.