Which Title Belt means the least??

[Giovanni18]

WBA, WBC, WBO, WBF? There are so many commissions and weight divisions now that alot of these belts and titles don't mean ****...which Title/ and or Title-Holder is the least relevant?

[Southpaw Great]

WBF and it aint even close........

[Giovanni18]

WBF and it aint even close........

LOL I just watched a cruiserweight defense of the WBF belt it was a joke, thats what prompted my question

[Boogie Nights]

all of them together, and pretty much any belt for which a fighter has to pay the sanctioning fees for the benefit of guys like jose suliman and all other moeny hungry clowns

[Ryn0]

Why WBF and not IBF. TBH all four WBO, WBC, WBA, IBF are all as bad as each other and I can't really tell which is more important even though the WBA, WBC were started first because of the super champions interim champions, champion in recess and all the rubbish.

They are all as bad as each other.

[fight_professor]

WBF isnt recognized by anyone. IBHOF recognizes IBF, WBA, WBC and now WBO. Anything else isnt worth squat.

WBO is pretty **** too if you ask me.

There should be one sanctioning body. Boxing needs a top down, universal regulator like other sports have. I like Ring for that reason.

[FloydTBE]

WBF is a complete joke

[Uturn]

wbf and ibo suck

[ulises_solis]

wbo is ****

[warp1432]

The WBA is clearly the worst of the big four.