Lineal champion does not equal Ring champion or vice versa

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • American_Ninja
    MMA FAN
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2004
    • 4445
    • 383
    • 382
    • 11,581

    #21
    I doubt that there is even 1 true Linear Champion left. The man who beat the man, who beat the man, etc. It would be a considerable challenge to trace every title back to the last Linear Champion, or maybe not. Lets see.

    Comment

    • Shadows
      All-Time Great
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 8293
      • 192
      • 250
      • 15,434

      #22
      Originally posted by American_Ninja
      I doubt that there is even 1 true Linear Champion left. The man who beat the man, who beat the man, etc. It would be a considerable challenge to trace every title back to the last Linear Champion, or maybe not. Lets see.
      Pongsaklek Wonjongkam is. The lineal title at flyweight dates back to Canto in the 70s.

      Comment

      • ss7falcon
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Jun 2006
        • 15
        • 1
        • 1
        • 6,316

        #23
        I always considered the lineal champion, either the "man who beat the man" or undisputed champion if the man retires.. going by that lineage died with Lennox Lewis, neither of the Klitchkos have ever been the undisputed champion and probably never will (since they wont fight each other)..


        here are the lineal HW champions

        cyberboxingzone.com/boxing/achamp.htm

        Comment

        • BIGBOXINGFAN
          Undisputed Champion
          • Dec 2009
          • 3365
          • 310
          • 78
          • 10,200

          #24
          This **** is confusing

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP