Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Ellerbe: Mayweather Did Not Know About Rematch Clause

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    another bullsxxx from the lying lover....
    who does ellerbe expect to believe him.....floydfans??
    floydfans are intelligent...very unlike floyd and the merrymays

    Comment


    • #62
      that's a classic comment from ellerbe. reduce the intake of XYLOCANE so he can remember the contents of his contract.

      Comment


      • #63
        Some of you guys are idiots! Pacman had the same rematch clause in all of his last 4 fights...The guy with the most money and more to lose always has a Rematch clause...NEXT STORY!

        Comment


        • #64
          I think it's a ***** move from Mayweather's team to want a rematch clause, when he's not the one with the title! If Mosley loses, where's his rematch clause as champion going in?

          Comment


          • #65
            Has anyone just refused to grant the rematch?

            I mean seeing as how Mosley is at the end of his career, it would be a nice note to end on if he were to somehow pull out the miracle.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by J Dubb II 330 View Post
              Once again I have to say this you are ignorant to the sport of boxing if you think mosley has a chance to knockout mayweather. Dude couldn't hit Forrest(god rest his soul) or Winky flush and Mayweathers defense is on another level. Infact winky let mosley hit him flush 5 times with no gaurd up to prove he couldn't be hurt by mosley. Mayweather has one hell of a chin. Mosley should focus on out pointing mayweather which is hard enough. He go in there with the sad excuse for a Jab and try to knock him out mayweather will make it look easy like he did Marquez
              i agree, trying to knock floyd out is a tough goal for shane... but not because floyd has a "chin"... honestly, ive never seen floyd's chin tested, his defense is THAT good... floyd shouldnt be brought up with winky & forrest. winky & forrest were big fighters with LONG piston-like jabs... winky was tough, he walked shane down & took his shots... not shoulder roll, evade, & use lateral movement, something i expect floyd to do... i would be surprised if he did anything different. but lets not forget floyd IS hittable (castillo, judah, ricky, oscar, even marquez had clean shots at floyd... but none of them would throw with authority like shane).... i doubt floyd will make shane look like marquez... the only way that happens if shane doesnt show up like clottey did with manny... but if shane stays busy and uses his jab, he might be able to get the judges nod... oscar walked away with an SD against floyd... im pretty sure shane will do better against floyd than oscar... lets hope.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by mathed View Post
                Since everyone is talking about the May/Mosley fight, how about that undercard. Only the Alvarez fight appeals to me because I have never seen him fight live before. The rest of the undercard looks terrible.

                At Las Vegas (HBO PPV): Shane Mosley vs. Floyd Mayweather Jr., 12 rounds, for Mosley's WBA welterweight title; Saul Alvarez vs. Jose Miguel Cotto, 10 rounds, welterweights; Daniel Ponce De Leon vs. Cornelius Lock, 10 rounds, featherweights; Hector David Saldivia vs. Said Ouali, 10 rounds, welterweights; Jesse Vargas vs. Arturo Mora, 8 rounds, junior welterweights; Eloy Perez vs. Gilberto Leon, 10 rounds, junior lightweights; Dion Savage vs. Tommie Speller, 6 rounds, middleweights; George Groves vs. TBA, 8 rounds, super middleweights
                actually, ive been very happy with GBP undercards compared to top rank.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by fightnight1 View Post
                  Sounds like a rematch clause is there to prevent Mosley from going after PacMan next if he should win?
                  definitely, if shane wins... floyd will be irrelevant, shane will go directly at pac (no blood testing needed)... then there will be a definite #1 p4p. so i dont blame floyd for requesting a rematch clause to keep shane on a short leash.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by waxfondler View Post
                    definitely, if shane wins... floyd will be irrelevant, shane will go directly at pac (no blood testing needed)... then there will be a definite #1 p4p. so i dont blame floyd for requesting a rematch clause to keep shane on a short leash.
                    People get caught up in the Mayweathers; ignorance, trash talk etc. Like it or not, Floyd is managed by the best guys in the game and they know what they're doing. Team Pacquiao is still recovering from everything that's transpired over the past few months.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                      People get caught up in the Mayweathers; ignorance, trash talk etc. Like it or not, Floyd is managed by the best guys in the game and they know what they're doing. Team Pacquiao is still recovering from everything that's transpired over the past few months.
                      thats the damn truth... pac's name & reputation was dragged through the mud from accusations... team pacquiao needs to think long and hard about how they proceed with pac's career from here. fighting margarito is not the answer either. LOL.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP