Tweet
Seems alot of people are saying Pac Man is only good because of the (supposed) steroids or whatever he's taking.
I am neutral in the whole Mayweather/Pac Man steroid debate but it did get me thinking:
What about Evander? He accomplished alot but was a proven roid abuser so does this take away from his achievments? Not only that but many place him as a top 10 all time HW so how does this affect that?
Also could he - without roids - have beaten a modern day Klit? After all he's 6'1" that's 2" less than Haye.
Thoughts?
I am neutral in the whole Mayweather/Pac Man steroid debate but it did get me thinking:
What about Evander? He accomplished alot but was a proven roid abuser so does this take away from his achievments? Not only that but many place him as a top 10 all time HW so how does this affect that?
Also could he - without roids - have beaten a modern day Klit? After all he's 6'1" that's 2" less than Haye.
Thoughts?