why not put the pressure on the commissions?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #51
    Originally posted by pistol whip
    Well they are the experts on what rules are right for boxing. Who else would be? you?


    Sorry my friend but I am not so ****** as to think for one second that boxing pundits on a Message board have any idea what's right and wrong for boxing. Especially when that idea came from a fighter who only mentioned the rules change to disrupt, annoy, and invade another fighters training camp.

    If they are such experts then why are they so interested in the USADA results?

    Comment

    • pistol whip
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 8645
      • 255
      • 4
      • 15,040

      #52
      Originally posted by No Ceilings
      Is this your debate? You have to be kidding me.
      My debate is that if you are gonna call yourself an instrment of change than you should behave like one. If Floyd did this for the sport the well why in the *** isn't he actually doing anything about it then. All he's done at this point is blow a lot of smoke up a lot of really dumb peoples asses.


      For *** sake Teddy Atlas did way more in regards to steroid usage in boxing once this whole thing kicked off and what did all his investigating and probing accomplish?

      Nothing!! The man has been eating crow for the last 3 month looking like a God Damn fool!

      Comment

      • B.U.R.N.E.R
        ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2010
        • 30197
        • 1,346
        • 400
        • 47,475

        #53
        Originally posted by pistol whip
        Well they are the experts on what rules are right for boxing. Who else would be? you?


        Sorry my friend but I am not so ****** as to think for one second that boxing pundits on a Message board have any idea what's right and wrong for boxing. Especially when that idea came from a fighter who only mentioned the rules change to disrupt, annoy, and invade another fighters training camp.

        Pacquiao can play basketball, shoot movies, kiss babies, do 24/7's, sign autographs, write and perform songs, throw out first pitches at Baseball games, hang with Kobe, shoot commercials, sign shoes, workout, spar, train, roll 30 deep on top of that, then sleep in a room with 10 people in it, even a guy in the closet watching film (Buboy), and then roll with guys who carry assault rifles.

        But 2 guys with USADA hats will throw off his whole camp?

        Cut the **** bro.
        Last edited by B.U.R.N.E.R; 04-13-2010, 02:20 PM.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #54
          Originally posted by pistol whip
          My debate is that if you are gonna call yourself an instrment of change than you should behave like one. If Floyd did this for the sport the well why in the *** isn't he actually doing anything about it then. All he's done at this point is blow a lot of smoke up a lot of really dumb peoples asses.


          For *** sake Teddy Atlas did way more in regards to steroid usage in boxing once this whole thing kicked off and what did all his investigating and probing accomplish?

          Nothing!! The man has been eating crow for the last 3 month looking like a God Damn fool!
          Pretty harsh. I wonder what you would say about a guy who not only doesn't even care about change, but said "eff you" to the test.

          Comment

          • brick wall
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 6480
            • 259
            • 35
            • 24,574

            #55
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            I guess some people don't like cheaters. Crazy, right?
            some people? all people don't like cheaters. even cheaters themselves hate their own kind. the thing is you actually need to caught somebody doing the act before you can call him a cheater. of course you will say how can you caught him if he doesn't wanna be tested, right? well there are already safety nets in place to caught him. if you think those are not enough blame it on the authority not the person.

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #56
              Originally posted by brick wall
              some people? all people don't like cheaters. even cheaters themselves hate their own kind. the thing is you actually need to caught somebody doing the act before you can call him a cheater. of course you will say how can you caught him if he doesn't wanna be tested, right? well there are already safety nets in place to caught him. if you think those are not enough blame it on the authority not the person.
              What if those safety nets have huge holes in them and you prefer a better one?

              Comment

              • brick wall
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 6480
                • 259
                • 35
                • 24,574

                #57
                Originally posted by No Ceilings
                So explain May 1st.
                lol you think he can still backtrack from his false advocacy after all what he said in media?

                Comment

                • brick wall
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 6480
                  • 259
                  • 35
                  • 24,574

                  #58
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  What if those safety nets have huge holes in them and you prefer a better one?
                  then deal directly with the authority who've implemented those rules...otherwise you're barking at the wrong tree.

                  Comment

                  • pistol whip
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 8645
                    • 255
                    • 4
                    • 15,040

                    #59
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    If they are such experts then why are they so interested in the USADA results?
                    To see if their system is indeed flawed or if it does indeed work. I'm not saying that the current drug testing or any drug testing method isn't fool proof. But just because Floyd says it's inefficiant doesn't make it so. For all you know the current policy could very well be sufficiant and i'm sure the commissions are looking into it. But again floyds word doesn't mean **** in the matter becasue he's not exactly a scientist and he's not exactly bringing in experts to justify his stance either. Floyd simply stated whatever ****** thing that popped into his head that he knew would cause drama period.


                    Hair testing is just as effective as blood testing and can actually show drug use going back 3 or 4 months into the past. Notice how Mr. Snake Oil Salesman didn't ask for that style of testing. Not invasive enough?

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #60
                      Originally posted by brick wall
                      lol you think he can still backtrack from his false advocacy after all what he said in media?
                      Well it's hard to call it "false" in light of May 1.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP