as a brit, david haye is giving brit fighters a bad name

[Russian Crushin]

Well if that were true (which it's not) it would be a damn shame.

Carl Froch beat a very good fighter for his title, unlike David Haye.

Carl Froch won his title in an exciting fight, unlike David Haye.

Carl Froch said he was the best man at 168 and backed it up by entering a tournament that would force him to fight 3 times in a year against 3 of the top 6 fighters at his weight.

David Haye said he was the best man at Heavyweight and backed it up by fighting guys were probably ranked 50th (Barrett) 6th (Valuev) and 15th (Ruiz)

Carl Froch never whines about purse splits or asks for money he doesn't deserve. He didn't refuse to fight in the tourney because he was the WBC Champion and deserved more than everyone else. If he had to have 2 rematches against Dirrell and Dirrell's brother he would sign the contract and say "I'll kick their asses on the same night"

David Haye might have more talent than Carl Froch but Froch is a true fighter with a champion's will. There is no doubt which guy a sensible boxing fan should rather support.

very well put i have to say.

[SoldierWarrior]

Well if that were true (which it's not) it would be a damn shame.

Carl Froch beat a very good fighter for his title, unlike David Haye.

Carl Froch won his title in an exciting fight, unlike David Haye.

Carl Froch said he was the best man at 168 and backed it up by entering a tournament that would force him to fight 3 times in a year against 3 of the top 6 fighters at his weight.

David Haye said he was the best man at Heavyweight and backed it up by fighting guys were probably ranked 50th (Barrett) 6th (Valuev) and 15th (Ruiz)

Carl Froch never whines about purse splits or asks for money he doesn't deserve. He didn't refuse to fight in the tourney because he was the WBC Champion and deserved more than everyone else. If he had to have 2 rematches against Dirrell and Dirrell's brother he would sign the contract and say "I'll kick their asses on the same night"

David Haye might have more talent than Carl Froch but Froch is a true fighter with a champion's will. There is no doubt which guy a sensible boxing fan should rather support.

David Hayes skills are overrated, I think Eddie Chambers is better then him minus the power that Haye has. David Haye really hasn't done all that much at heavyweight, he'd probably lose to Povetkin, Adamek, Chambers, Arreola, or Solis.

[maverock]

Lets be honest, and im a brit

Well much respect to you not falling for Haye's scam, like many other Brits are.

We all may feel it is our duty to support our local heroes not matter what but when they are full of lies and BS we must remain objective and let them prove their worth in the ring rather than with their mouth.

Big props to you for this post, I couldn't agree more.

[Pirao]

Slimshandy how can you say that David Haye is an embarassment to British boxing fans yet you are obviously a huge fan of Froch, a man that made a name for himself off the back of Calzaghe? Froch is a hypercrete and has far more mouth than talent.

I would guarantee that 95% of English people would rather have Haye represent our country than Froch. Haye will obviously fight the Klit brothers and regardless of if he beats them it's obvious he has more boxing ability than Froch.

Froch has the balls to fight the best in his division. Haye does not, simple. One is a guy who will face whoever, the other is a ***** ducking fraud, I'll let you figure out which one is the fighter and who is the ducker.

[Pirao]

Well if that were true (which it's not) it would be a damn shame.

Carl Froch beat a very good fighter for his title, unlike David Haye.

Carl Froch won his title in an exciting fight, unlike David Haye.

Carl Froch said he was the best man at 168 and backed it up by entering a tournament that would force him to fight 3 times in a year against 3 of the top 6 fighters at his weight.

David Haye said he was the best man at Heavyweight and backed it up by fighting guys were probably ranked 50th (Barrett) 6th (Valuev) and 15th (Ruiz)

Carl Froch never whines about purse splits or asks for money he doesn't deserve. He didn't refuse to fight in the tourney because he was the WBC Champion and deserved more than everyone else. If he had to have 2 rematches against Dirrell and Dirrell's brother he would sign the contract and say "I'll kick their asses on the same night"

David Haye might have more talent than Carl Froch but Froch is a true fighter with a champion's will. There is no doubt which guy a sensible boxing fan should rather support.

I couldn't have said it better myself.

[slimshandy69]

Well if that were true (which it's not) it would be a damn shame.

Carl Froch beat a very good fighter for his title, unlike David Haye.

Carl Froch won his title in an exciting fight, unlike David Haye.

Carl Froch said he was the best man at 168 and backed it up by entering a tournament that would force him to fight 3 times in a year against 3 of the top 6 fighters at his weight.

David Haye said he was the best man at Heavyweight and backed it up by fighting guys were probably ranked 50th (Barrett) 6th (Valuev) and 15th (Ruiz)

Carl Froch never whines about purse splits or asks for money he doesn't deserve. He didn't refuse to fight in the tourney because he was the WBC Champion and deserved more than everyone else. If he had to have 2 rematches against Dirrell and Dirrell's brother he would sign the contract and say "I'll kick their asses on the same night"

David Haye might have more talent than Carl Froch but Froch is a true fighter with a champion's will. There is no doubt which guy a sensible boxing fan should rather support.

did you know froch the wbc holder not only went to america to kncok out jermaine taylor, he actually took a pay cut...i think he only got 750 000 dollas. As wbc champ, thats terrible.

Plus froch is more talented than haye, whos hayes best win, enzo macrenelli???lololol

[PensionKiller]

Carl froch might be as lippy, but he backs it up by fighting the best schooling them then ****ing off.

What david haye is doing is embarrassing as his performacne against 38 year old bums.

He knows full well that he will get destroyed and turned to mush. But after that video a year ago when he went up to wlad and dissed him etc. He fakes backs injuries and now this???


He knows full well the klit bros are not going to fight each other and he knows full well, that they are bigger names, so the 50 50 is worful.

Lets be honest, and im a brit, he is **** scared of them and wants to defend against 38 year old mandatories who have been knocked out in 1 round in 1996...

The guy is a horrible person i hope adamek kncoks him out...

You may be a Brit, but the colour of your skin is all I'm gonna say is your motive.

I don't have a problem with that, just don't use the Brit thing as anything.

[slimshandy69]

You may be a Brit, but the colour of your skin is all I'm gonna say is your motive.

I don't have a problem with that, just don't use the Brit thing as anything.

evidence please that skin colours my motive??

[shearer999]

Carl froch might be as lippy, but he backs it up by fighting the best schooling them then ****ing off.

What david haye is doing is embarrassing as his performacne against 38 year old bums.

He knows full well that he will get destroyed and turned to mush. But after that video a year ago when he went up to wlad and dissed him etc. He fakes backs injuries and now this???


He knows full well the klit bros are not going to fight each other and he knows full well, that they are bigger names, so the 50 50 is worful.

Lets be honest, and im a brit, he is **** scared of them and wants to defend against 38 year old mandatories who have been knocked out in 1 round in 1996...

The guy is a horrible person i hope adamek kncoks him out...

There is some truth in what your saying but i got to ask you.

When you say "Froch is schooling the best" who are you referring too as the last two fights of his could very well have gone either way

[PensionKiller]

Well if that were true (which it's not) it would be a damn shame.

Carl Froch beat a very good fighter for his title, unlike David Haye.

Carl Froch won his title in an exciting fight, unlike David Haye.

Carl Froch said he was the best man at 168 and backed it up by entering a tournament that would force him to fight 3 times in a year against 3 of the top 6 fighters at his weight.

David Haye said he was the best man at Heavyweight and backed it up by fighting guys were probably ranked 50th (Barrett) 6th (Valuev) and 15th (Ruiz)

Carl Froch never whines about purse splits or asks for money he doesn't deserve. He didn't refuse to fight in the tourney because he was the WBC Champion and deserved more than everyone else. If he had to have 2 rematches against Dirrell and Dirrell's brother he would sign the contract and say "I'll kick their asses on the same night"

David Haye might have more talent than Carl Froch but Froch is a true fighter with a champion's will. There is no doubt which guy a sensible boxing fan should rather support.

Froch does whine over Calzaghe, TV exposure and money.

There was a TV deal but he wnated more money.

When he found out tax was so higth, he was talking about leaving the country.

Froch even puts his toughness to being part Polish.

Don't get it twisted.

I'm not saying Haye is perfect, even as a fan I know he isn't, but I like him more than Froch. Froch always comes across as arrogant to me.