Are you for or against better drug testing boxing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • B.U.R.N.E.R
    ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 30197
    • 1,346
    • 400
    • 47,475

    #11
    Originally posted by Scott9945
    I'm for it, but it should be implemented by boxing commissions, not egomaniac boxers.
    So what if the commissions still don't have it in 2010?

    Isnt the obvious next step for the boxers to put into the contracts?

    Comment

    • Carpe Diem
      Seize the day
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 16026
      • 1,235
      • 997
      • 44,413

      #12
      Two *******s in one stone.

      Comment

      • Prime 407
        The Best Around
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 2331
        • 141
        • 185
        • 10,074

        #13
        For it as long as everyone has to do it and not just singling out certain people

        Comment

        • AKATheMack
          Unreasonably Logical
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Nov 2004
          • 11155
          • 430
          • 285
          • 19,179

          #14
          Originally posted by No Ceilings
          So what if the commissions still don't have it in 2010?

          Isnt the obvious next step for the boxers to put into the contracts?
          The obvious next step would to be not worrying about and letting the commission do their job. Do something to change the rules that doesnt include holding up big fights.

          Comment

          • Marcov
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 40438
            • 4,613
            • 8,724
            • 92,214

            #15
            Wow another thread about drug testing, creative!

            Comment

            • B.U.R.N.E.R
              ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 30197
              • 1,346
              • 400
              • 47,475

              #16
              Originally posted by AKATheMack
              The obvious next step would to be not worrying about and letting the commission do their job. Do something to change the rules that doesnt include holding up big fights.
              So the fighter who has to take the punches shouldnt "worry about it"?

              Comment

              • Scott9945
                Gonna be more su****ious
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2007
                • 22032
                • 741
                • 1,371
                • 30,075

                #17
                Originally posted by No Ceilings
                So what if the commissions still don't have it in 2010?

                Isnt the obvious next step for the boxers to put into the contracts?
                A contract is whatever two parties agree to. But if one party doesn't agree to it I have no problem understanding why.

                Comment

                • B.U.R.N.E.R
                  ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 30197
                  • 1,346
                  • 400
                  • 47,475

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Marcov
                  Wow another thread about drug testing, creative!
                  This one hasnt been made yet. Where are you brilliant threads at?

                  Comment

                  • matic21
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 635
                    • 306
                    • 421
                    • 7,083

                    #19
                    Drug testing is never a bad thing IMO...Especially in a sport like Boxing.

                    Comment

                    • B.U.R.N.E.R
                      ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 30197
                      • 1,346
                      • 400
                      • 47,475

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Scott9945
                      A contract is whatever two parties agree to. But if one party doesn't agree to it I have no problem understanding why.
                      What if said party has no problems giving two full tubes of Blood 19 days away from their fight?

                      I think every situation is different and should be treated as such ya know.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP