First and foremost cong**** to Hatton for beating Koysta. I really thought that Koysta was going to be able to keep hatton at bay with his jab and right hand (and ring smarts) but that kid from manchester was as hungery as a great white shark. again kudos to hatton for smothering tyszu and nulifying his big right hand. i would also like to say that i'm now becoming a a fan of ricky hatton (i used to watch this kid in hbo and grimmace everytime he threw a body shot in multiple combinations from different angles...no one does that anymore. major respect for him to ressurect a dying art).
now all said and done. who thought that koysta deserved a knockdown? granted hatton was not hit by the typical body shot (the kind where you're roling around the floor grimmacing and suckin' wind...lol...sorry, painful memories of my ring escapades lol) but it was right at the belt line. it seemed to me that the area was fair game....and any hit in fair terretory where it causes you to place a hand on the mat is considered a knockdown. hatton didn't seem to be affected that much. but he did fall.
maybe the knock down would have surged some energy into koysta to lessen that gap...or maybe it would have unleased a more despreate beast in an already hunry manchester fighter...
what do you guys think?
now all said and done. who thought that koysta deserved a knockdown? granted hatton was not hit by the typical body shot (the kind where you're roling around the floor grimmacing and suckin' wind...lol...sorry, painful memories of my ring escapades lol) but it was right at the belt line. it seemed to me that the area was fair game....and any hit in fair terretory where it causes you to place a hand on the mat is considered a knockdown. hatton didn't seem to be affected that much. but he did fall.
maybe the knock down would have surged some energy into koysta to lessen that gap...or maybe it would have unleased a more despreate beast in an already hunry manchester fighter...
what do you guys think?

Comment