Why do people think Abraham is gonna beat Froch?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tocayito1
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2009
    • 1098
    • 43
    • 126
    • 7,598

    #21
    Originally posted by Iceta Lives
    I'm asking this because when you compare their two performances against Dirrell, Froch did a hell of a lot better against Dirrell than Abraham did. Wasn't Abraham the one with the busted, bloodied face at the end of the fight? And Dirrell got his nose bloodied in the fight against Froch if I remember right. Abraham's skills are blown out of proportion.


    because froch is as skilled as any of the other super 6 fighters when they were 9 yrs old

    Comment

    • cleaner147
      Retired
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 4940
      • 308
      • 484
      • 11,344

      #22
      Originally posted by Iceta Lives
      I'm asking this because when you compare their two performances against Dirrell, Froch did a hell of a lot better against Dirrell than Abraham did. Wasn't Abraham the one with the busted, bloodied face at the end of the fight? And Dirrell got his nose bloodied in the fight against Froch if I remember right. Abraham's skills are blown out of proportion.
      U cant judge a fighter because of his last performance. u have to see more than two or three fights, because every fighter has got another history, another style. Bad match-up for Abe, I think he was going to KTFO him( what he did.LOLz), but u know.

      Comment

      • Idgas
        vas Normandy
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 3810
        • 111
        • 99
        • 10,583

        #23
        first off, i don't think froch did better than abraham. froch only landed what? one or two significant punches? abraham on the other hand, landed solid shots through out the fight if you look closely. it wasn't a lot but definitely more than froch. i watched the abraham-dirrell fight a number of times and most of dirrell's punches were blocked. it was like the pac clottey-fight. dirrell only looked good due to his workrate, elusive defense, and his opponent's inactivity.

        second, froch is completely different from dirrell. froch is slower and comes forward. abraham is gonna have a field day with him.

        if anyone's skill is blown out of proportion, it's froch. his heart and chin carried him a long way but he's losing that 0 in this tournament like everyone else.
        Last edited by Idgas; 04-10-2010, 05:43 PM.

        Comment

        • any craic lad?
          W-A-R
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 5338
          • 127
          • 51
          • 18,318

          #24
          Originally posted by Iceta Lives
          I'm asking this because when you compare their two performances against Dirrell, Froch did a hell of a lot better against Dirrell than Abraham did. Wasn't Abraham the one with the busted, bloodied face at the end of the fight? And Dirrell got his nose bloodied in the fight against Froch if I remember right. Abraham's skills are blown out of proportion.
          If the Andre Dirrell that fought AA had fought Froch he would have given the judges no choice but to give him the fight and maybe even tkod Froch late on i still think Andre won the Froch fight but he could have fought with a little more balls like the way he did for the last 3 rounds he should have done for the first 9

          Comment

          • geribeetus
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 1027
            • 30
            • 116
            • 7,490

            #25
            froch ain't got a great defense, but it's gettin a little bit underrated around here. he rolls with punches decently. it doesn't look like the punches miss, but many of them don't land as solid as some of yall think.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP