Two questions about Nate Campbell

[BoxerDood]

First of all, how the heck did he become Bradley's WBO mandatory? His previous fight was against Funeka at 135.

Secondly, will he even perform that well at 140? Bradley was easily beating him in their 3 round fight, and he's only getting older. A near one year layoff isn't going to help him out against Ortiz either.

[boxing2106]

First of all, how the heck did he become Bradley's WBO mandatory? His previous fight was against Funeka at 135.

Secondly, will he even perform that well at 140? Bradley was easily beating him in their 3 round fight, and he's only getting older. A near one year layoff isn't going to help him out against Ortiz either.

it really wont.. thats why im going to watch ortiz kick his ass live ! i really wanna see someone give it to campbell. nd pluss that fight will get ortiz back into the mix.. i think ortiz would destroy khan now cuz this aint the amatuers where you got headgear

[Clyde Barrow]

First of all, how the heck did he become Bradley's WBO mandatory? His previous fight was against Funeka at 135.

Secondly, will he even perform that well at 140? Bradley was easily beating him in their 3 round fight, and he's only getting older. A near one year layoff isn't going to help him out against Ortiz either.

When a past titlist moves up in weight, h often gets granted instant mando status from the organization whose belt he held at his previous weight.

I don't see Ortiz dominating the fight. It's winnable for either guy. Nate is a hungry fighter. He doesn't do anything particularly great, but he's a well rounded guy. I think he's tougher than Ortiz. I really had no problem with Ortiz stopping vs Marcos, but the **** he said after the fact made me question his guts. I think Nate can beat him if he doesn't get KO'd early.

[Pullcounter]

First of all, how the heck did he become Bradley's WBO mandatory? His previous fight was against Funeka at 135.

Secondly, will he even perform that well at 140? Bradley was easily beating him in their 3 round fight, and he's only getting older. A near one year layoff isn't going to help him out against Ortiz either.

1) nate's with GBP now

2) ortiz isn't bradley. ortiz is a quitter.

[Ekscape]

1) nate's with GBP now

2) ortiz isn't bradley. ortiz is a quitter.

Oh is that right?... Okay then 250k on Ortiz Over Bradley, you down?.... Campbell was getting hurt by Bradley's punches Ortiz will knock if fkn head off

[Pullcounter]

Oh is that right?... Okay then 250k on Ortiz Over Bradley, you down?.... Campbell was getting hurt by Bradley's punches Ortiz will knock if fkn head off

anyone else but campbell. I don't bet on that guy no more. he's way too inconsistent.

[BoxerDood]

When a past titlist moves up in weight, h often gets granted instant mando status from the organization whose belt he held at his previous weight.

I don't see Ortiz dominating the fight. It's winnable for either guy. Nate is a hungry fighter. He doesn't do anything particularly great, but he's a well rounded guy. I think he's tougher than Ortiz. I really had no problem with Ortiz stopping vs Marcos, but the **** he said after the fact made me question his guts. I think Nate can beat him if he doesn't get KO'd early.

So he doesn't have to own the belt when he moves up? Alright, I see now.

As for the winner of Ortiz-Campbell, I think this will be another case of a young, hungry fighter using an older fighter to make a name for himself.