SRL admitted that when Duran landed his shots that they actually felt like bricks! lmao. If i had to put money on the fight I'd say Floyd, but on the other hand....Bricks landing pretty boy Floyd? ha yea.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Duran v.s. Floyd who is greater?
Collapse
-
-
this would actualy be a great fight at 135lbs people forget that floyd himself was a beast in his 135lbs days
people see duran as a guy who hits hard but he was a smart boxer a good technician Duran would move his head, slip punches, stay in punching position, feint and counter with deadly accuracy
id have to go with duran but it wouldnt be an easy fight for him and floyd does have the skill to beat a guy like duran but id go with duran u.d maybe late k.o at 135lbs at 147 id say duran agin but maybe only by s.d
p.s its not an easy fight for duran like some of you guys are saying
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostYou guys underestimate the currant great fighters , its not a case of the grass is always greener in the old days , you make larger than life legends out of the old greats with each year passed , Duran would have a hard time with Floyd and was beaten by lesser fighters than Floyd , when you have a a slick great they can go with anyone in history , Pacs a little different because he trades but Floyd , you got to get to him to beat him .
Legends get inflated and so many times people just say "Oh (legend) would've destroyed (current great)".
Half these people commenting have probably never even watched Duran fight. "No mas" ring any bells? Duran flustered and too slow to catch a quick and clever slick boxer.
I'm in the minority that says Floyd takes this, but I'm probably thinking about it more realistically then most of you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dans01234 View PostThis is the best post I saw.
Legends get inflated and so many times people just say "Oh (legend) would've destroyed (current great)".
Half these people commenting have probably never even watched Duran fight. "No mas" ring any bells? Duran flustered and too slow to catch a quick and clever slick boxer.
I'm in the minority that says Floyd takes this, but I'm probably thinking about it more realistically then most of you.
leonard was not a slick boxer?
Comment
-
Originally posted by LightsOutLewis View Postduran was slow at 135lbs? i think its you thats never seen a duran fight
leonard was not a slick boxer?
"Leonard was not a slick boxer?" Are you asking me, telling me? What is it?
Don't question me just for the sake of argument.
Comment
-
-
i know what weight the fight was at and im telling you leonard was a slick boxer no question about it he didnt have great D like floyd but his offence was on another level he was also just as quick maybe even quicker than floyd
im saying duran was quicker at 135lbs you saying he is he is slow and flustered is a joke
Comment
-
Originally posted by LightsOutLewis View Posti know what weight the fight was at and im telling you leonard was a slick boxer no question about it he didnt have great D like floyd but his offence was on another level he was also just as quick maybe even quicker than floyd
im saying duran was quicker at 135lbs you saying he is he is slow and flustered is a joke
I'm talking about Duran-Leonard.
Duran was not flustered against Leonard. Got it.
Comment
Comment