38 year old mosley > clottey

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sweet Jesus
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 11512
    • 568
    • 332
    • 13,576

    #21
    Originally posted by Pullcounter
    I thought *****s were saying mosley was too old a year ago.
    a year ago you were still a mayweather fan. how do you like dem apples?

    Comment

    • Biolink
      Donaire is #1
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2006
      • 9926
      • 642
      • 2,205
      • 40,170

      #22
      Originally posted by WetSexyLlamaPR
      Your revealing your nuthuggery for Floyd if you genuinely believe an older, inactive Shane is a harder fight and a more meaningful win then Cotto's...
      I don't think its out of the realm of possibilty that Shane is better than Clottey, so I don't see the nutthugging in what that guy said.

      Also I don't get where inactivty for an old fighter automatically equals a bad thing. If anything too much ring activity at an old age is what kills older fighters. Am I saying that inactivity can't effect Mosley? No. But the answer isn't as black and white as one may think

      Comment

      • shacasulu
        Banned
        • Jun 2008
        • 398
        • 35
        • 0
        • 925

        #23
        Originally posted by WetSexyLlamaPR
        Your revealing your nuthuggery for Floyd if you genuinely believe an older, inactive Shane is a harder fight and a more meaningful win then Cotto's...
        its not guaranteed that shane is a harder fight but one thing i know for sure is that shane's meaning to the welterweight division is bigger now than when cotto beat him.

        and please man dont think im trying to discredit cotto's win of mosley. no way man cotto has a great win. take nothing away from that.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP