-
-
Sam Peter vs Wlad 2 SHOULD NEVER happen. Not at one point in that fight was Wlad hurt and he won by a VERY large margin. Those Scam Cheater back of the head blows don't count as knockdowns.Comment
-
Exactly and Wlad won't get any credit at all for beating Peter again. All the ignorant haters will bash Wlad and say he's cherry picking because he's not fighting Haye. I know that sounds like rediculous menality but it's the truth with most NSB posters. The guy is far from a cherry picker. He's the only champion who just keeps defending one after another in the same weight division.Comment
-
I'm a Wlad fan but statement is ridiculous.
114 - 111 is not a very large margin.and he won by a VERY large margin.
They shouldn't but unfortunately they did.Those Scam Cheater back of the head blows don't count as knockdowns.
Anyway, Peter doesn't deserve another shot for beating those 4 bums. Ideally he should fight Povetkin next and the winner can fight Wlad. Wlad in the meantime could fight Haye and preferably in August at the latest and not October or November like Haye was suggesting.Comment
-
Only idiots would bash Wlad for honoring his mandatory fights, as he should if he wants to keep them belts. However, a second Peter fight would be dull, and it's clear Wlad wouldn't deserve credit for beating a man he already decisively beat, it's just logic.
One could bash Wlad for his optional defense choices, which is different.
But I think it's obvious even in that category that Wlad fights the best out there and duck no one. So man up Povetkin !Comment
-
Right you are, and near misses or grazes also don't count. When Peter staged his last, despairing rush, in the 10th rd, back-pedalling Klitschko very fast right across the ring, swinging wildly, that last swing should be carefully watched on slo-mo, and note how Klitschko pulled his upper body back so far as to just avoid the punch, but also to overbalance back into the ropes. You'll notice I hope) that Klitschko's shoulders have fallen level with the top rope, which meant that he was falling, to bounce off the ropes to the canvas.
He was up by the count of 3, very fast for a big man, especially when the count of 1 had been uttered whilst he was still falling.
Personally, I think that Peter, since he's lost 3 fights, all against opposition, has become better. He knows his chin isn't granite, so he'll be more careful, and not leave himself open so much. However, Klitschko knows exactly how to beat him, as long as he never again becomes complaisant, as he was against Sanders.
Klitschko should win every round, and KO Peter around the 8th rd.Comment
-
I beg to differ with you, and here's why; If klitschko went down from an illegal rabbit punch, a shoulder clutch and push down, an overbalance into the ropes etc. in none of these supposed KD's was he hurt ..in ANY way (except on the scoresheet). The proof is that he got up right away, showing NO SIGNS of damage, and continued his boxing lesson.
As for winning the fight easily, well.......although 114-111 is not a huge margin, since the knockdowns were so fake that even the commentators noticed, and remarked, one can feel free to add 5 deducted points to Klitschko's tally, and deduct 2 from Peter, since otherwise, Klitschko actually won the rounds in which the "KD's" were scored.
This would leave the score 119-109, and I am not sure which rd gained Peter that single point............................VOILA!!Comment
Tweet
Comment