Berto asked for a Rematch Clause, for the Fight to be Made

[Junito-Rulez]

Nevermind, it's a good thing, he'll get taken to school twice and won't be able to say it was a fluke. If you get beaten by Quintana it can't be a fluke since he doesn't have one punch KO power and needs to be the better boxer to win his fight.

[MAXWELL_]

for those interested have a betting prop going on this one:

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=373429

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Rematch for the hell of it are Bull****, IMO.


Lets say Berto gets Shiut Out 12-0, WHy would that deserve aaaa rematch!

[War Dinamita]

Nothing wrong with asking for rematch clauses.

[Don Johnson]

Berto's ***** ass, asked for a inmediate rematch clause for the fight to be made. Why he didnt rematch Collazo then? Anyways the WBC will order the winer of Berto-QUintana to face the winner of Colllaaazo-Haydid




http://www.vocero.com/index.php?opti...oxeo&Itemid=24

That's that bitchassness right there, War El Indio!!!!

[Sweet Jesus]

Berto beat Collazo clearly.

[flyest1]

What Al Haymon managed fighter doesn't have a rematch clause in there contract if they lose? They probably learned from the Hop vs Tarver fight.

Also from what I remember reading. Collazo turned down a rematch because of his pay.

[SoldierWarrior]

Also from what I remember reading. Collazo turned down a rematch because of his pay.

He was going to get cheated on a pay-day when the first fight was competitive and close?

[Sweet Jesus]

Nevermind, it's a good thing, he'll get taken to school twice and won't be able to say it was a fluke. If you get beaten by Quintana it can't be a fluke since he doesn't have one punch KO power and needs to be the better boxer to win his fight.

You must have forgotten about the last time Quintana fought at WW.

[Sweet Jesus]

He was going to get cheated on a pay-day when the first fight was competitive and close?

Because pay isn't determined based on how close a fight is.