I know this topic has been beaten to death and slaughtered Many times over. But some of the Pacquiao fans (Umeed) thinks that the 24 days option proposed by Manny is fair. As we all know PBF wanted up to the day of the fight testing or 0 days. While Pacman wanted a 30 day/1 month window. PBF later proposed a 14 day option and Team Pacman didn't accept the proposition. What I want to know is what do you think is fair. Or if you had control as an outside mediator what would you propose?
What is the more resonable compromise?
Collapse
-
Obviously the middle date is the best compromise, and most fair.
It doesn't take a genius to know that. -
I know this topic has been beaten to death and slaughtered Many times over. But some of the Pacquiao fans (Umeed) thinks that the 24 days option proposed by Manny is fair. As we all know PBF wanted up to the day of the fight testing or 0 days. While Pacman wanted a 30 day/1 month window. PBF later proposed a 14 day option and Team Pacman didn't accept the proposition. What I want to know is what do you think is fair. Or if you had control as an outside mediator what would you propose?
Random drug testing till weight in..
I always been for random drug testing. Just not how Mayweather and team attacked pac with false accusations..
They should have went NSAC first..Comment
-
The only thing I agree with is that Team Mayweather needs to be more respectful. Baseless accusations and insults can cause deaths.Comment
-
what i was trying to tell you, had you bothered to try and comprehend it more, was that the thread title of the previous thread wasn't neutral and was one of the reasons of the lopsided ratio of the votes (causing unneeded ******s from a certain group of posters). my challenge was for you to make a thread with the exact opposite title of that one (which you clearly didn't do, but whatever)to prove you that the results wouldn't be that much of a landslide.
comprende?Comment
-
i don't know if you are talking about me, but try reading my posts from that previous thread. i never said 24 days is "fairer(wtf)", i said both can be considered fair.
what i was trying to tell you, had you bothered to try and comprehend it more, was that the thread title of the previous thread wasn't neutral and was one of the reasons of the lopsided ratio of the votes (causing unneeded ******s from a certain group of posters). my challenge was for you to make a thread with the exact opposite title of that one (which you clearly didn't do, but whatever)to prove you that the results wouldn't be that much of a landslide.
comprende?Comment
-
yeah np, i don't really care too much about the issue, honestly, i'm not on any of those fckers' payroll or anything, i just wanted to state my observation, but beyond that, they're on their own.Comment
-
The 14 day offer is a compromise of Manny's 24 day compromise. I think Floyd should have just accepted the 24 days...
On the other hand, i see no reason why Pac wouldn't accpet the 14 days...
The fight not happening is both fighter's fault!Comment
-
I want 0 days. You want 30 days. Cut that ***** in the middle. Seems like a sensible compromise to me. This really is beating a dead horse though.Comment
Comment