Tweet
yeah it was definitely the ref...not hatton's smothering style or tszyu's exhaustion.
-
-
Get a life you sad ****s. Hatton owned him from the first bell and it was **** all to do with the referee,they were both holding and hitting. I've just got back from the fight and there was absolutley nothing dubious about it. Hatton beat a legend at the end of his career,end of story.Comment
-
i dont think it was the ref that made him stay o nteh stool
can't u jus accept that your fighter lost?Comment
-
I dunno... I'm sure I saw the ref get in a couple of stiff jabs when no one was looking.Comment
-
Just for the record I was being sarcastic.Comment
-
what?Originally posted by deuskie
get lost you goof ball you sore loserComment
-
Oh my god the sound of the people at the begining of the thread is pathethic. Terrible terrible excuses.
Great fight and an asskicking.Comment
-
WOW, It's funny that I'm not the only one who thinks that..Originally posted by deuskie
I just posted this under another thread..
<<
My only complaint is towards the Ref.
Every time they clinched, Hatton was locking and holding Tszyu's hands (most of the time his right hand) while he kept on hitting him (uppercuts, etc) Props to Hatton, but shame on the ref. I believe he should have braken them up and also warned Ricky for hitting while holding.
Anyhow...
Even though I'm crushed, yet, I won 5 Mil Poins and Congrads to Ricky Hatton and all of his loyal Fans who believed in him.
As for me, I felt that the young Hatton would be too much for Tszyu, but no one believed (I was even critisized as a Tszyu fan)>>Comment
-
I think Hatton came out with a great game plan, and he fought well, but the fix was definitely in.Originally posted by AnorakI KNEW someone would say this.
I was going to have a "Zoo Nuthugger's Excuse Form" for you to select your favourites. If the referee was biased, then why didn't he penalise Zoo for the TWO low blows he did against Ricky earlier?
I will admit that Hatton should have been docked a point, maybe two, for that, but to suggest the referee helped the fight is ridiculous. Zoo was hitting and holding just as much.
Things I saw from Hatton:
6 times, when they were on the inside, he looks at Pariash and nods, and Parish immediately steps in and breaks them up. These were all times when Tszyu was effectively tying him up or hitting him and Hatton was unable to hit back.
8 times, Hatton flagrantly hits on the break, with the ref between them. Never received the first warning.
More times than I could count, Hatton led with his head. Never received a warning on his own.
More times than I could count, Hatton used his forearm in Tszyu's throat forcing him to the ropes, holding him there and launching left hooks.
More times than I could count, Hatton would pin Tszyu's right arm to his side, spinning Tszyu out and hitting him with his own right.
A clear KD was called a slip. It can be argued that it was a low blow, but it landed on the belt, which Hatton wore high.
A flagrant, purposeful, fierce low blow and no point deduction.
Spinning Hatton and aiming a purposeful punch at the back of his head.
Are purposeful fouls supposed to be an automatic 2 point deduction?
This is the dirtiest fight I have ever seen. It's even worse than the time that Mickey Vann let Hatton throw 18 flagrant low blows before saying anything.
The shame of it is, Hatton had the perfect plan and was executing it well. He didn't need the other ****.Last edited by vB Martin; 06-05-2005, 12:28 AM.Comment
-
What a ****** ref!
Doesn't break them when Hatton is winning on the inside, but yet, he immediately breaks them when Tszyu starts throwing punches while tangled.
Doesn't do anything about Hatton's wrestling style, and when he leads with his head.
Doesn't warn Hatton for locking opponent's arms.
Warns Hatton 4 times for hitting Tszyo behind the head, instead of finally taking a point off.
Does NOTHING for the intentional low blow!
What the hell? F*uck this clown.Comment
Comment