Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Muhammad Ali or Wladimir Klitschko - Who Is The More Exciting Heavyweight?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by The Beatles View Post
    Is Tunney right???

    Ali's Most Exciting Fights

    Muhammad Ali vs Joe Frazier I
    Muhammad Ali vs Joe Frazier III
    Muhammad Ali vs George Foreman
    Muhammad Ali vs Earnie Shavers
    Muhammad Ali vs Ken Norton I
    Muhammad Ali vs Ken Norton II
    Muhammad Ali vs Cleveland Williams
    Muhammad Ali vs Doug Jones
    Muhammad Ali vs Archie Moore
    Muhammad Ali vs Leon Spinks
    Muhammad Ali vs Sonny Liston I

    Wlad's Most Exciting Fights

    ????????????
    ????????
    ??????????
    ???????????
    Besides the fact that Ali was an outfighter and still more exciting to watch than Klit, I'll give you another reason why he was more exciting.... He fought the best Heavyweights of any era, and not only beat them, but knocked them out... Who has Wlad knocked out that could be considered an ATG?

    Comment


    • #82
      Wlad beats none of Ali's major opponents. Sonny, Joe, George, Kenny and Larry would all f*** Wlad up. Other's like Chuvato etc would be tough for him too.

      Comment


      • #83
        ALi is more exciting

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by capt_sam View Post
          This post is worthy of ridicule. For one, you cant eliminate Ali's KOs as in his era (and until 2003) HW meant 190+ lbs. The goal posts have only just been moved, not Ali's doing-else you have to say men like Rocky were cruiserweights and discount them as HW.
          OF COURSE Marciano is nothing but a cruiserweight.

          And OF COURSE Louis vs Schmeling (192 lbs vs 198 lbs) is nothing but a cruiserweight fight.

          They just didn't call it cruiser then. But 190lbs is 190lbs now and then. No matter how you call it.

          Originally posted by capt_sam View Post
          The Foreman/Frazier/Ali argument you are attempting is nonsense.
          Can you imagine the OUTCRY if Wlad would fight a HALFBLIND featherfist like Frazier? It would be the ultimate proof of "how the division sucks". Yet in the world of CLAYtons Frazier vs Ali is ALWAYS the proof of Ali's greatness.

          I also want to remind every CLAYton of the following BIZARRE attitude:
          Wlad wins -> Wlad beat a bum
          Clay wins -> Clay is teh greatess.
          Wlad loses -> Wlad is a bum
          Clay loses -> Wow, Clay's opponent was strooong

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by HitmanHattonAY View Post
            if you compare Ali's opponents to Klitschos, you will get a shock

            Ali fought the best out there and they were better than competition now !!
            You are at step #3
            http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...58#post5440358

            Ali fought the best fighters available in the 70ies (cruisers, former cruisers, dwarfs, handicaps...)

            Wlad wouldn't even be allowed to face such a crappy opposition like Ali. There are only a few mentionables: Ken Norton, Foreman, Lyle.Other opponents (like handicapped Frazier) wouldn't be allowed in the ring or would be the proof of how the division sucks.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by knn View Post
              OF COURSE Marciano is nothing but a cruiserweight.

              And OF COURSE Louis vs Schmeling (192 lbs vs 198 lbs) is nothing but a cruiserweight fight.

              They just didn't call it cruiser then. But 190lbs is 190lbs now and then. No matter how you call it.


              Can you imagine the OUTCRY if Wlad would fight a HALFBLIND featherfist like Frazier? It would be the ultimate proof of "how the division sucks". Yet in the world of CLAYtons Frazier vs Ali is ALWAYS the proof of Ali's greatness.

              I also want to remind every CLAYton of the following BIZARRE attitude:
              Wlad wins -> Wlad beat a bum
              Clay wins -> Clay is teh greatess.
              Wlad loses -> Wlad is a bum
              Clay loses -> Wow, Clay's opponent was strooong
              Excellent posting, knn!

              Comment


              • #87
                This is disrespectful and hilarious.

                Alis fights with Frazier, Foreman, ect are some of the biggest and most important moments in boxing history. When Ali fought the world's eyes were on him.

                Wlads last fight didn't even get televised outside Europe.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Ali easily.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    81 - 16.

                    Which tells me that Tunney has 16 alts.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by knn View Post
                      You are at step #3
                      http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...58#post5440358

                      Ali fought the best fighters available in the 70ies (cruisers, former cruisers, dwarfs, handicaps...)

                      Wlad wouldn't even be allowed to face such a crappy opposition like Ali. There are only a few mentionables: Ken Norton, Foreman, Lyle.Other opponents (like handicapped Frazier) wouldn't be allowed in the ring or would be the proof of how the division sucks.
                      ignored from thread for being a stupid ****

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP