a video of why dirrell lost to froch...

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shattered Jaw
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 5131
    • 261
    • 141
    • 11,649

    #81
    Anyone who thinks Dirrell landed 50% of his punches in that fight is delusional. Anyone who thinks Froch landed 6% is delusional.

    It was probably more like 30/25 in favour of Dirrell.

    Comment

    • krazyn8tive
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 7970
      • 714
      • 996
      • 37,433

      #82
      Originally posted by slimshandy69
      "a trace of blood under the right eye of dirrell"

      ""bloody nose and lips" after round 4...

      the left hook in the 8th..

      Direll lost badly...
      wrong. he slammed andre on the canvas, punched him in the back of the head repeatedly and only got ONE warning. home cookin', english style

      Comment

      • AC-Voltage
        Interim Champion
        • Mar 2010
        • 719
        • 33
        • 0
        • 6,886

        #83
        Originally posted by AC-Voltage
        Heres why "Dirrell" won... Not why Froch lost.



        Show me why "Froch" won, not why Dirrell lost.

        Haha, I love how at 2:12 of the video the crowd goes crazy over a bunch of missed shots, and Dirrell shuts em up with 2 huge left hooks.
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^bump^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

        Comment

        • Shattered Jaw
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 5131
          • 261
          • 141
          • 11,649

          #84
          Also, people should note Dirrell was warned at least 6 times for holding. I went back and watched it carefully - the ref was even going to Dirrell's corner and warning him specifically that'll he will take a point away for holding. Which he did when Dirrell continued to do so.

          Also, if you are going to hold on to an opponent and dip low during combat you are going to get struck in the side and the back of the head. Froch actually hit Dirrell mostly in the side of the head when people say he rabbit punched him (there were very few punches to the back of the head). I mean there was one point when Dirrell started one of his hugging fits and Froch was dooig anything he could to slam the right hand into Dirrell's face and sie of his head - which he did at least 3 times. Dirrell was just holding tighter and complaining to the referee and trying to officiate the fight himself - bad move when your opponent is striking you, breaking out of the clinch, striking you again and building points.

          The referee actually did a very good job in the fight. Everything controversial came from Dirrell's vastly excessive holding - which the referee rightly punished with a point deduction. I see no problem.

          Fight was mostly even - some good hard shots landed by both. Dirrell was negative until the 10th round - backing away with lots of skipping around and running. Rounds split evenly - point deduction leads to a 114-113 Froch win.

          Not hard to understand.

          Comment

          • shade darkar
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 6460
            • 227
            • 337
            • 12,996

            #85
            Originally posted by AC-Voltage
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^bump^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
            i wouldnt bother wasting your time. iv already shown him that video, and he claims dirrell didnt land anything in that video! lol. as i said earlier, it must have been the wind snapping froch's head back!

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP