Froch fans prove Dirrell was not robbed

[Bring It On]

I would love to see Dirrell and Froch fight again. Dirrell would school him.

Although I thought he won the last time, he could have fought a much better fight. I guess it was a big step up from his previous fights and he wasn't really comfortable.

[Joeyzagz]

Its about quality of punches not quantity.


Froch obviously won the fight, and Direll was running because he couldnt handle Carls power.

[Vanihm]

hat video is B*******. How about someone makes a video showing all the 18.124 times Dirells jab fell short, the 567 times he initiated a clinch and the 9 rounds he only threw 3 punches per round.

By the way, Danish television was neutral and had Froch winning by 4. So STFU!

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

What did Froch do to win the fight then? I've noticed Froch fans never have a rebuttal that states why Froch deserved the win, they just say something about Dirrell running and/or falling over.

Who do you believe landed more punches, Froch or Dirrell?

He worked away with his jab. It showed on Dirrell's face by the end of the fight.


This is completely overlooked by people who want to insist this was a clear victory for Dirrell (the only circumstance under which we could call the fight a robbery), completely written out of the fight.


To the last sentence, the fight is scored in rounds, no?